The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross.
Open accessAbstract
Two accessions, representing the species Lycopersicon esculentum (cultivated tomato) and Lycopersicon pennellii (a wild relative), were evaluated for 11 quantitative traits and found to be significantly different for 10 of the traits. Transgressive segregation was observed for eight of the traits in a large interspecific F2 population. When restriction fragment length polymorphism markers were used as probes for the quantitative trait loci (QTL) underlying the traits, 74 significant QTL (LOD > 2) were detected. Thirty-six percent of those QTL had alleles with effects opposite to those predicted by the parental phenotypes. These QTL were directly related to the appearance of transgressive individuals in the F2 for those traits which showed transgressive segregation. However, the same types of QTL (with allelic effects opposite to those predicted by the parents) were also observed for traits that did not display transgressive segregation in the F2. One such trait was dry weight accumulation. When two overdominant QTL (detected in the F2) for this trait were backcrossed into the L. esculentum genetic background, transgressive individuals were recovered and their occurrence was associated with the two QTL demonstrating the potential for transgressive segregation for all characters and implicating overdominance as a second cause of transgressive segregation. Epistasis was not implicated in transgressive segregation in either the F2 or backcross generations. Results from this research not only reveal the basis of wide-cross transgressive segregation, but demonstrate that molecular markers can be used to identify QTL (from wild species) responsible for transgressive phenotypes and to selectively transfer them into crop species. This strategy might be used to improve many traits of economic importance including those for which wild species appear phenotypically inferior to their cultivated counterparts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity
Feinberg, A. P., & Vogelstein, B. (1983) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9 · Cited by 24,887
Lander, E. S., Green, P., Abrahamson, J., Barlow, A., Daly, M. J., Lincoln, S. E., & Newburg, L. (1987) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3 · Cited by 6,656
THE ESTIMATION OF MAP DISTANCES FROM RECOMBINATION VALUES
KOSAMBI, D. D. (1943) · Annals of Eugenics · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1943.tb02321.x · Cited by 5,872
Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.
Lander, E. S., & Botstein, D. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/121.1.185 · Cited by 5,235
Variation and Evolution in Plants
Stebbins, G. L. (1950) · doi:10.7312/steb94536 · Cited by 2,704
Paterson, A. H., Damon, S., Hewitt, J. D., Zamir, D., Rabinowitch, H. D., Lincoln, S. E., Lander, E. S., & Tanksley, S. D. (1991) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/127.1.181 · Cited by 899
Self-citationRFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon
Miller, J. C., & Tanksley, S. D. (1990) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00226743 · Cited by 674
Self-citationHYBRIDIZATION AS A SOURCE OF VARIATION FOR ADAPTATION TO NEW ENVIRONMENTS
Lewontin, R. C., & Birch, L. C. (1966) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1966.tb03369.x · Cited by 653
TOWARD A SATURATED LINKAGE MAP IN TOMATO BASED ON ISOZYMES AND RANDOM cDNA SEQUENCES
Bernatzky, R., & Tanksley, S. D. (1986) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/112.4.887 · Cited by 539
Self-citationStuber, C. W., Edwards, M. D., & Wendel, J. F. (1987) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183x002700040006x · Cited by 449
Cited by
Seed Banks and Molecular Maps: Unlocking Genetic Potential from the Wild
Tanksley, S. D., & McCouch, S. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5329.1063 · Cited by 2,353
Self-citationTransgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation
Rieseberg, L. H., Archer, M. A., & Wayne, R. K. (1999) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6886170 · Cited by 820
Model Selection and the Principle of Minimum Description Length
Hansen, M. H., & Yu, B. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753168398 · Cited by 788
The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast
Brem, R. B., & Kruglyak, L. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408709102 · Cited by 603
Epistasis for Three Grain Yield Components in Rice (Oryxa sativa L.)
Li, Z., Pinson, S. R. M., Park, W. D., Paterson, A. H., & Stansel, J. W. (1997) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/145.2.453 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- deVicente, M. C., & Tanksley, S. D.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-06-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 585-596
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1841466207
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 12.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/134.2.585
- The paper
- deVicente, M. C., & Tanksley, S. D. (1993). QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/134.2.585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.