The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: dynamics and parameter estimates from natural populations.
Open accessAbstract
In Drosophila simulans, cytoplasmically transmitted Wolbachia microbes cause reduced egg hatch when infected males mate with uninfected females. A Wolbachia infection and an associated mtDNA variant have spread northward through California since 1986. PCR assays show that Wolbachia infection is prevalent throughout the continental US and Central and South America, but some lines from Florida and Ecuador that are PCR-positive for Wolbachia do not cause incompatibility. We estimate from natural populations infection frequencies and the transmission and incompatibility parameter values that affect the spread of the infection. On average, infected females from nature produce 3-4% uninfected ova. Infected females with relatively low fidelity of maternal transmission show partial incompatibility with very young infected laboratory males. Nevertheless, crosses between infected flies in nature produce egg-hatch rates indistinguishable from those produced by crosses between uninfected individuals. Incompatible crosses in nature produce hatch rates 30-70% as high as those from compatible crosses. Wild-caught infected and uninfected females are equally fecund in the laboratory. Incompatibility decreases with male age, and age-specific incompatibility levels suggest that males mating in nature may often be 2 or 3 weeks old. Our parameter estimates accurately predict the frequency of Wolbachia infection in California populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The evolutionary genetics of speciation
Coyne, J. A., & Allen Orr, H. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0210 · Cited by 657
Removing symbiotic Wolbachia bacteria specifically inhibits oogenesis in a parasitic wasp
Dedeine, F., Vavre, F., Fleury, F., Loppin, B., Hochberg, M. E., & Boulétreau, M. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.101304298 · Cited by 489
From Parasite to Mutualist: Rapid Evolution of Wolbachia in Natural Populations of Drosophila
Weeks, A. R., Turelli, M., Harcombe, W. R., Reynolds, K. T., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050114 · Cited by 447
Self-citationBeyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem
McGraw, E. A., & O'Neill, S. L. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2968 · Cited by 381
Variable fitness effects of Wolbachia infection in Drosophila melanogaster
Fry, A. J., Palmer, M. R., & Rand, D. M. (2004) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800514 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Turelli, M., & Hoffmann, A. A.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-08-01
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1319-1338
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1845170918
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: dynamics and parameter estimates from natural populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/140.4.1319
- The paper
- Turelli, M., & Hoffmann, A. A. (1995). Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: dynamics and parameter estimates from natural populations. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/140.4.1319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.