The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences.
Open accessAbstract
A statistical method was developed for reconstructing the nucleotide or amino acid sequences of extinct ancestors, given the phylogeny and sequences of the extant species. A model of nucleotide or amino acid substitution was employed to analyze data of the present-day sequences, and maximum likelihood estimates of parameters such as branch lengths were used to compare the posterior probabilities of assignments of character states (nucleotides or amino acids) to interior nodes of the tree; the assignment having the highest probability was the best reconstruction at the site. The lysozyme c sequences of six mammals were analyzed by using the likelihood and parsimony methods. The new likelihood-based method was found to be superior to the parsimony method. The probability that the amino acids for all interior nodes at a site reconstructed by the new method are correct was calculated to be 0.91, 0.86, and 0.73 for all, variable, and parsimony-informative sites, respectively, whereas the corresponding probabilities for the parsimony method were 0.84, 0.76, and 0.51, respectively. The probability that an amino acid in an ancestral sequence is correctly reconstructed by the likelihood analysis ranged from 91.3 to 98.7% for the four ancestral sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Yang, Z. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00160154 · Cited by 2,960
Self-citationEstimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution
Yang, Z. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00178256 · Cited by 1,076
Self-citation
Cited by
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121 · Cited by 39,969
Self-citationPAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood
Yang, Z. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm088 · Cited by 13,879
Self-citationInferring the historical patterns of biological evolution
Pagel, M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44766 · Cited by 5,200
Whelan, S., & Goldman, N. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003851 · Cited by 2,849
Yang, Z. (1998) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025957 · Cited by 1,457
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Z., Kumar, S., & Nei, M.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-12-01
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1641-1650
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2111762123
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/141.4.1641
- The paper
- Yang, Z., Kumar, S., & Nei, M. (1995). A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/141.4.1641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.