The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gene Flow and Natural Selection in the Origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Close Relatives
Open accessAbstract
The divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives D. persimilis and D. pseudoobscura bogotana has been studied using comparative DNA sequence data from multiple nuclear loci. New data from the Hsp82 and Adh regions, in conjunction with existing data from Adh and the Period locus, are examined in the light of various models of speciation. The principal finding is that the three loci present very different histories, with Adh indicating large amounts of recent gene flow among the taxa, while little or no gene flow is apparent in the data from the other loci. The data were compared with predictions from several isolation models of divergence. These models include no gene flow, and they were found to be incompatible with the data. Instead the DNA data, taken together with other evidence, seem consistent with divergence models in which natural selection acts against gene flow at some loci more than at others. This family of models includes some sympatric and parapatric speciation models, as well as models of secondary contact and subsequent reinforcement of sexual isolation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hudson, R. R., & Kaplan, N. L. (1985) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/111.1.147 · Cited by 1,555
Cited by
Hybridization as an invasion of the genome
Mallet, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 · Cited by 2,196
The role of hybridization in evolution
Barton, N. H. (2001) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01216.x · Cited by 1,603
Hey, J., & Nielsen, R. (2004) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.103.024182 · Cited by 1,442
Self-citationChromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species
Noor, M. A. F., Grams, K. L., Bertucci, L. A., & Reiland, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.221274498 · Cited by 911
Host races in plant–feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation
Drès, M., & Mallet, J. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1059 · Cited by 909
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, R. L., Wakeley, J., & Hey, J.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-11-01
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1091-1106
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2183901534
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene Flow and Natural Selection in the Origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Close Relatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/147.3.1091
- The paper
- Wang, R. L., Wakeley, J., & Hey, J. (1997). Gene Flow and Natural Selection in the Origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Close Relatives. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/147.3.1091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.