The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational and Experimental Characterization of Physically Clustered Simple Sequence Repeats in Plants
Abstract
The type and frequency of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in plant genomes was investigated using the expanding quantity of DNA sequence data deposited in public databases. In Arabidopsis, 306 genomic DNA sequences longer than 10 kb and 36,199 EST sequences were searched for all possible mono- to pentanucleotide repeats. The average frequency of SSRs was one every 6.04 kb in genomic DNA, decreasing to one every 14 kb in ESTs. SSR frequency and type differed between coding, intronic, and intergenic DNA. Similar frequencies were found in other plant species. On the basis of these findings, an approach is proposed and demonstrated for the targeted isolation of single or multiple, physically clustered SSRs linked to any gene that has been mapped using low-copy DNA-based markers. The approach involves sample sequencing a small number of subclones of selected randomly sheared large insert DNA clones (e.g., BACs). It is shown to be both feasible and practicable, given the probability of fortuitously sequencing through an SSR. The approach is demonstrated in barley where sample sequencing 34 subclones of a single BAC selected by hybridization to the Big1 gene revealed three SSRs. These allowed Big1 to be located at the top of barley linkage group 6HS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5,264 microsatellites
Dib, C., Fauré, S., Fizames, C., Samson, D., Drouot, N., Vignal, A., Millasseau, P., Marc, S., Kazan, J., Seboun, E., et al. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380152a0 · Cited by 2,928
Röder, M. S., Korzun, V., Wendehake, K., Plaschke, J., Tixier, M.-H., Leroy, P., & Ganal, M. W. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/149.4.2007 · Cited by 2,504
Nested Retrotransposons in the Intergenic Regions of the Maize Genome
SanMiguel, P., Tikhonov, A., Jin, Y.-K., Motchoulskaia, N., Zakharov, D., Melake-Berhan, A., Springer, P. S., Edwards, K. J., Lee, M., Avramova, Z., et al. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5288.765 · Cited by 1,401
Assignment of 30 Microsatellite Loci to the Linkage Map of Arabidopsis
Bell, C. J., & Ecker, J. R. (1994) · Genomics · doi:10.1006/geno.1994.1023 · Cited by 1,024
PCR‐amplified microsatellites as markers in plant genetics
Morgante, M., & Olivieri, A. M. (1993) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.t01-9-00999.x · Cited by 1,018
A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome
Dietrich, W. F., Miller, J., Steen, R., Merchant, M. A., Damron-Boles, D., Husain, Z., Dredge, R., Daly, M. J., Ingalls, K. A., O'Connor, T. J., et al. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380149a0 · Cited by 827
Panaud, O., Chen, X., & McCouch, S. R. (1996) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/bf02172406 · Cited by 744
Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat
Röder, M. S., Plaschke, J., König, S. U., Börner, A., Sorrells, M. E., Tanksley, S. D., & Ganal, M. W. (1995) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/bf00288605 · Cited by 708
Length polymorphisms of simple sequence repeat DNA in soybean.
Akkaya, M. S., Bhagwat, A. A., & Cregan, P. B. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/132.4.1131 · Cited by 683
Cited by
Thiel, T., Michalek, W., Varshney, R., & Graner, A. (2003) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-002-1031-0 · Cited by 2,535
Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes
Morgante, M., Hanafey, M., & Powell, W. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng822 · Cited by 1,161
Transferable EST-SSR markers for the study of polymorphism and genetic diversity in bread wheat
Gupta, P. K., Rustgi, S., Sharma, S., Singh, R., Kumar, N., & Balyan, H. S. (2003) · Molecular Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1007/s00438-003-0921-4 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Cardle, L., Ramsay, L., Milbourne, D., Macaulay, M., Marshall, D., & Waugh, R.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-10-01
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 847-854
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1946340895
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational and Experimental Characterization of Physically Clustered Simple Sequence Repeats in Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/156.2.847
- The paper
- Cardle, L., Ramsay, L., Milbourne, D., Macaulay, M., Marshall, D., & Waugh, R. (2000). Computational and Experimental Characterization of Physically Clustered Simple Sequence Repeats in Plants. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/156.2.847
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
