Cited by 131Insect symbiosis and bacterial influencesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Intraspecific variation in symbiont genomes: bottlenecks and the aphid-buchnera association

Funk, Daniel J, Wernegreen, Jennifer J, Moran, Nancy A·2001·Genetics

Abstract

Buchnera are maternally transmitted bacterial endosymbionts that synthesize amino acids that are limiting in the diet of their aphid hosts. Previous studies demonstrated accelerated sequence evolution in Buchnera compared to free-living bacteria, especially for nonsynonymous substitutions. Two mechanisms may explain this acceleration: relaxed purifying selection and increased fixation of slightly deleterious alleles under drift. Here, we test the divergent predictions of these hypotheses for intraspecific polymorphism using Buchnera associated with natural populations of the ragweed aphid, Uroleucon ambrosiae. Contrary to expectations under relaxed selection, U. ambrosiae from across the United States yielded strikingly low sequence diversity at three Buchnera loci (dnaN, trpBC, trpEG), revealing polymorphism three orders of magnitude lower than in enteric bacteria. An excess of nonsynonymous polymorphism and of rare alleles was also observed. Local sampling of additional dnaN sequences revealed similar patterns of polymorphism and no evidence of food plant-associated genetic structure. Aphid mitochondrial sequences further suggested that host bottlenecks and large-scale dispersal may contribute to genetic homogenization of aphids and symbionts. Together, our results support reduced Ne as a primary cause of accelerated sequence evolution in Buchnera. However, our study cannot rule out the possibility that mechanisms other than bottlenecks also contribute to reduced Ne at aphid and endosymbiont loci.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/genetics/157.2.477

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effective population size of bacterial endosymbionts is smaller than that of their free-living relatives, partially due to the transmission bottleneck across insect generations.

    “The effective population size of bacterial endosymbionts is smaller than that of their free-living relatives, partially due to the transmission bottleneck across insect generations (Moran 1996;Funk et al. 2001;Herbeck et al. 2003).”

    From RELAX: Detecting Relaxed Selection in a Phylogenetic Framework (2015) · cites this paper as Funk et al. 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Funk, D. J., Wernegreen, J. J., & Moran, N. A.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Funk, Daniel J
Venue
Genetics
Published
2001-02-01
Volume
157
Issue
2
Pages
477-489
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W2116733146
Cited by
131
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Buchnera, effective population size, population bottleneck, relaxed purifying selection, non-synonymous polymorphisms, rare alleles, mother-to-child transmission, genetic homogenization, host dispersal, amino acid synthesis
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Aphids, Chromosomes, DNA, Haplotypes, Mitochondria, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Phylogeny, Polymorphism, Genetic, Symbiosis, Genetic Variation, Genome, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Evolution, Molecular, Buchnera

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review