The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing Allelic Dropout and Genotype Reliability Using Maximum Likelihood
Abstract
A growing number of population genetic studies utilize nuclear DNA microsatellite data from museum specimens and noninvasive sources. Genotyping errors are elevated in these low quantity DNA sources, potentially compromising the power and accuracy of the data. The most conservative method for addressing this problem is effective, but requires extensive replication of individual genotypes. In search of a more efficient method, we developed a maximum-likelihood approach that minimizes errors by estimating genotype reliability and strategically directing replication at loci most likely to harbor errors. The model assumes that false and contaminant alleles can be removed from the dataset and that the allelic dropout rate is even across loci. Simulations demonstrate that the proposed method marks a vast improvement in efficiency while maintaining accuracy. When allelic dropout rates are low (0–30%), the reduction in the number of PCR replicates is typically 40–50%. The model is robust to moderate violations of the even dropout rate assumption. For datasets that contain false and contaminant alleles, a replication strategy is proposed. Our current model addresses only allelic dropout, the most prevalent source of genotyping error. However, the developed likelihood framework can incorporate additional error-generating processes as they become more clearly understood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR
Taberlet, P. (1996) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/24.16.3189 · Cited by 1,491
Cited by
micro ‐ checker : software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data
VAN OOSTERHOUT, C., HUTCHINSON, W. F., WILLS, D. P. M., & SHIPLEY, P. (2004) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x · Cited by 10,327
SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation
Morin, P. A., Luikart, G., Wayne, R. K., & the SNP workshop group (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.009 · Cited by 1,080
Quantifying genotyping errors in noninvasive population genetics
BROQUET, T., & PETIT, E. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02352.x · Cited by 331
Reliable microsatellite genotyping of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) using faecal DNA
Frantz, A. C., Pope, L. C., Carpenter, P. J., Roper, T. J., Wilson, G. J., Delahay, R. J., & Burke, T. (2003) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01848.x · Cited by 266
ESTIMATION OF EUROPEAN OTTER (LUTRA LUTRA) POPULATION SIZE BY FECAL DNA TYPING IN SOUTHERN ITALY
Prigioni, C., Remonti, L., Balestrieri, A., Sgrosso, S., Priore, G., Mucci, N., & Randi, E. (2006) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/05-mamm-a-294r1.1 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, C. R., Joyce, P., & Waits, L. P.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 357-366
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2181961150
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Allelic Dropout and Genotype Reliability Using Maximum Likelihood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/160.1.357
- The paper
- Miller, C. R., Joyce, P., & Waits, L. P. (2002). Assessing Allelic Dropout and Genotype Reliability Using Maximum Likelihood. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/160.1.357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.