Bounds on the Minimum Number of Recombination Events in a Sample History
Abstract
Recombination is an important evolutionary factor in many organisms, including humans, and understanding its effects is an important task facing geneticists. Detecting past recombination events is thus important; this article introduces statistics that give a lower bound on the number of recombination events in the history of a sample, on the basis of the patterns of variation in the sample DNA. Such lower bounds are appropriate, since many recombination events in the history are typically undetectable, so the true number of historical recombinations is unobtainable. The statistics can be calculated quickly by computer and improve upon the earlier bound of Hudson and Kaplan (1985). A method is developed to combine bounds on local regions in the data to produce more powerful improved bounds. The method is flexible to different models of recombination occurrence. The approach gives recombination event bounds between all pairs of sites, to help identify regions with more detectable recombinations, and these bounds can be viewed graphically. Under coalescent simulations, there is a substantial improvement over the earlier method (of up to a factor of 2) in the expected number of recombination events detected by one of the new minima, across a wide range of parameter values. The method is applied to data from a region within the lipoprotein lipase gene and the amount of detected recombination is substantially increased. Further, there is strong clustering of detected recombination events in an area near the center of the region. A program implementing these statistics, which was used for this article, is available from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/mathgen/programs.html.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because the four-gamete test is known to underestimate the true number of ancestral recombination events, SARGE will systematically underestimate the true number of ancestral recombination events in a dataset by design.
“Because the four-gamete test is known to underestimate the true number of ancestral recombination events (12, 13), SARGE will systematically underestimate the true number of ancestral recombination events in a dataset by design.”
From An ancestral recombination graph of human, Neanderthal, and Denisovan genomes (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A haplotype map of the human genome
The International HapMap Consortium (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04226 · Cited by 5,858 · see citing works
Mapping Trait Loci by Use of Inferred Ancestral Recombination Graphs
Minichiello, M. J., & Durbin, R. (2006) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/508901 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
An ancestral recombination graph of human, Neanderthal, and Denisovan genomes
Schaefer, N. K., Shapiro, B., & Green, R. E. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc0776 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Finding Associations in Dense Genetic Maps: A Genetic Algorithm Approach
Clark, T. G., De Iorio, M., Griffiths, R. C., & Farrall, M. (2005) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000088845 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Myers, S. R., & Griffiths, R. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Myers, Simon R
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 375-394
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1830906757
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- recombination detection, sample history, coalescent, lipoprotein lipase gene
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Models, Genetic, Recombination, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review