Cited by 177Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Bounds on the Minimum Number of Recombination Events in a Sample History

Myers, Simon R, Griffiths, Robert C·2003·Genetics

Abstract

Recombination is an important evolutionary factor in many organisms, including humans, and understanding its effects is an important task facing geneticists. Detecting past recombination events is thus important; this article introduces statistics that give a lower bound on the number of recombination events in the history of a sample, on the basis of the patterns of variation in the sample DNA. Such lower bounds are appropriate, since many recombination events in the history are typically undetectable, so the true number of historical recombinations is unobtainable. The statistics can be calculated quickly by computer and improve upon the earlier bound of Hudson and Kaplan (1985). A method is developed to combine bounds on local regions in the data to produce more powerful improved bounds. The method is flexible to different models of recombination occurrence. The approach gives recombination event bounds between all pairs of sites, to help identify regions with more detectable recombinations, and these bounds can be viewed graphically. Under coalescent simulations, there is a substantial improvement over the earlier method (of up to a factor of 2) in the expected number of recombination events detected by one of the new minima, across a wide range of parameter values. The method is applied to data from a region within the lipoprotein lipase gene and the amount of detected recombination is substantially increased. Further, there is strong clustering of detected recombination events in an area near the center of the region. A program implementing these statistics, which was used for this article, is available from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/mathgen/programs.html.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/genetics/163.1.375

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because the four-gamete test is known to underestimate the true number of ancestral recombination events, SARGE will systematically underestimate the true number of ancestral recombination events in a dataset by design.

    “Because the four-gamete test is known to underestimate the true number of ancestral recombination events (12, 13), SARGE will systematically underestimate the true number of ancestral recombination events in a dataset by design.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myers, S. R., & Griffiths, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Myers, Simon R
Venue
Genetics
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
163
Issue
1
Pages
375-394
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W1830906757
Cited by
177
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
recombination detection, sample history, coalescent, lipoprotein lipase gene
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Models, Genetic, Recombination, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review