The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic Structure and Diversity Among Maize Inbred Lines as Inferred From DNA Microsatellites
Abstract
Two hundred and sixty maize inbred lines, representative of the genetic diversity among essentially all public lines of importance to temperate breeding and many important tropical and subtropical lines, were assayed for polymorphism at 94 microsatellite loci. The 2039 alleles identified served as raw data for estimating genetic structure and diversity. A model-based clustering analysis placed the inbred lines in five clusters that correspond to major breeding groups plus a set of lines showing evidence of mixed origins. A “phylogenetic” tree was constructed to further assess the genetic structure of maize inbreds, showing good agreement with the pedigree information and the cluster analysis. Tropical and subtropical inbreds possess a greater number of alleles and greater gene diversity than their temperate counterparts. The temperate Stiff Stalk lines are on average the most divergent from all other inbred groups. Comparison of diversity in equivalent samples of inbreds and open-pollinated landraces revealed that maize inbreds capture <80% of the alleles in the landraces, suggesting that landraces can provide additional genetic diversity for maize breeding. The contributions of four different segments of the landrace gene pool to each inbred group's gene pool were estimated using a novel likelihood-based model. The estimates are largely consistent with known histories of the inbreds and indicate that tropical highland germplasm is poorly represented in maize inbreds. Core sets of inbreds that capture maximal allelic richness were defined. These or similar core sets can be used for a variety of genetic applications in maize.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
Cited by
The Genetic Architecture of Maize Flowering Time
Buckler, E. S., Holland, J. B., Bradbury, P. J., Acharya, C. B., Brown, P. J., Browne, C., Ersoz, E., Flint-Garcia, S., Garcia, A., Glaubitz, J. C., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1174276 · Cited by 1,457
Self-citationGenetic Structure and Diversity in Oryza sativa L.
Garris, A. J., Tai, T. H., Coburn, J., Kresovich, S., & McCouch, S. (2005) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.035642 · Cited by 1,137
Köllner, T. G., Held, M., Lenk, C., Hiltpold, I., Turlings, T. C. J., Gershenzon, J., & Degenhardt, J. (2008) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.107.051672 · Cited by 470
Dell’Acqua, M., Gatti, D. M., Pea, G., Cattonaro, F., Coppens, F., Magris, G., Hlaing, A. L., Aung, H. H., Nelissen, H., Baute, J., et al. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0716-z · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, K., Goodman, M., Muse, S., Smith, J. S., Buckler, E., & Doebley, J.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2117-2128
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2120323255
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Structure and Diversity Among Maize Inbred Lines as Inferred From DNA Microsatellites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/165.4.2117
- The paper
- Liu, K., Goodman, M., Muse, S., Smith, J. S., Buckler, E., & Doebley, J. (2003). Genetic Structure and Diversity Among Maize Inbred Lines as Inferred From DNA Microsatellites. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/165.4.2117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.