The Arabidopsis Information Resource in 2024
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Since 1999, The Arabidopsis Information Resource (www.arabidopsis.org) has been curating data about the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Its primary focus is integrating experimental gene function information from the peer-reviewed literature and codifying it as controlled vocabulary annotations. Our goal is to produce a “gold standard” functional annotation set that reflects the current state of knowledge about the Arabidopsis genome. At the same time, the resource serves as a nexus for community-based collaborations aimed at improving data quality, access, and reuse. For the past decade, our work has been made possible by subscriptions from our global user base. This update covers our ongoing biocuration work, some of our modernization efforts that contribute to the first major infrastructure overhaul since 2011, the introduction of JBrowse2, and the resource's role in community activities such as organizing the structural reannotation of the genome. For gene function assessment, we used gene ontology annotations as a metric to evaluate: (1) what is currently known about Arabidopsis gene function and (2) the set of “unknown” genes. Currently, 74% of the proteome has been annotated to at least one gene ontology term. Of those loci, half have experimental support for at least one of the following aspects: molecular function, biological process, or cellular component. Our work sheds light on the genes for which we have not yet identified any published experimental data and have no functional annotation. Drawing attention to these unknown genes highlights knowledge gaps and potential sources of novel discoveries.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Syntenic comparison was performed using MC-Scan and the output PAF file was uploaded into JBrowse2 to create the above syntenic panel. founding member of the AgBioData Consortium (www.agbiodata. org) and supports efforts to ensure that agricultural and related data are FAIR (Wilkinson et al. 2016).”
MethodUniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023
The UniProt Consortium, Bateman, A., Martin, M.-J., Orchard, S., Magrane, M., Ahmad, S., Alpi, E., Bowler-Barnett, E. H., Britto, R., Bye-A-Jee, H., et al. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · Cited by 7,210 · see citing works
Functional unknomics: Systematic screening of conserved genes of unknown function
Rocha, J. J., Jayaram, S. A., Stevens, T. J., Muschalik, N., Shah, R. D., Emran, S., Robles, C., Freeman, M., & Munro, S. (2023) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002222 · Cited by 70 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Rocha et al. (2023), in creating their Unknownome database, assigned a “knowness” score clusters based on a number of factors including GO evidence weights.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Reiser, L., Bakker, E., Subramaniam, S., Chen, X., Sawant, S., Khosa, K., Prithvi, T., & Berardini, T. Z.
- Affiliations
- Phoenix Bioinformatics (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reiser, Leonore
- Berardini, Tanya Z
- Venue
- GENETICS
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-03-08
- Volume
- 227
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- PMC
- PMC11075553
- OpenAlex
- W4392600686
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 79 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 29 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 22.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- TAIR
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- Arabidopsis thaliana, gene function annotation, controlled vocabulary, Gene Ontology, biocuration, genome reannotation, unknown genes
- MeSH terms
- Arabidopsis, Genome, Plant, Arabidopsis Proteins, Databases, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Gene Ontology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review