Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 524

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of the Minimum Data Set Cognitive Performance Scale: Agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination

Hartmaier, S. L., Sloane, P. D., Guess, H. A., Koch, G. G., Mitchell, C. M., Phillips, C. D.·1995·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Almost all nursing homes in the United States are required by the 1987 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act to assess each resident's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status using a standard instrument known as the Minimum Data Set (MDS). We report a validation study to show that the MDS Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS), a cognitive measure generated from 5 MDS items (comatose status, decision making, short-term memory, making self understood, and eating) can be used to detect cognitive impairment as defined by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). METHODS: Two hundred subjects were randomly recruited from 8 nursing home facilities in North Carolina. Two medical students administered the MMSE, while a geriatric research nurse was responsible for collecting MDS cognitive items, which included the 5 items required for generating CPS scores. Cognitive impairment was defined by MMSE scores adjusted for education. Agreement between the CPS and the MMSE in identifying cognitively impaired subjects was then evaluated. RESULTS: The CPS showed substantial agreement with the MMSE in the identification of cognitive impairment; the sensitivity was .94 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .90, .98), the specificity was .94 (95% CI: .87, .96), and the diagnostic accuracy as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was .96 (95% CI: .88, 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: The MDS Cognitive Performance Scale, when performed by a trained research nurse using recommended protocols, provides a valid measure of cognitive status in nursing home residents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/50a.2.m128

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 524

Metadata

Authors
Hartmaier, S. L., Sloane, P. D., Guess, H. A., Koch, G. G., Mitchell, C. M., & Phillips, C. D.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
1995-03-01
Volume
50A
Issue
2
Pages
M128-M133
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W1988088882
Cited by
524
References
2
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of the Minimum Data Set Cognitive Performance Scale: Agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gerona/50a.2.m128
The paper
Hartmaier, S. L., Sloane, P. D., Guess, H. A., Koch, G. G., Mitchell, C. M., & Phillips, C. D. (1995). Validation of the Minimum Data Set Cognitive Performance Scale: Agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/50a.2.m128

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.