Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Peripheral Neuropathy: A True Risk Factor for Falls

Richardson, J. K., Hurvitz, E. A.·1995·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have recently linked peripheral nerve dysfunction in the elderly with postural instability and falls. Many causes of peripheral neuropathy (PN) have the potential for associated comorbidities, which could themselves be the true cause of these falls. This study tested the hypothesis that PN is not a cause of falls but just a marker for a comorbidity (e.g., central nervous system dysfunction) that is the true cause of falls in this elderly population. METHODS: Twenty subjects with an electromyographically documented axonal peripheral neuropathy affecting the lower extremities were identified (PN group) and matched by age and sex with 20 subjects with normal lower extremity electrodiagnostic studies (C group). A focused history and physical examination designed to identify factors other than PN which might cause falls was performed, and a history of falls or postural instability over the previous year was obtained. RESULTS: PN was found to be significantly associated with the self-report of falls (11/20, 55% vs 2/20, 10%; odds ratio 17.0, 95% CI = 2.5, > 100) and postural instability (7/9, 77% vs 0/0, 0%; odds ratio 13.0, 95% CI = 1.5, > 100) over the previous year. There was no significant difference between the two groups in total number of other risk factors known to be associated with falls, (23 PN group vs 18 C group). The PN group did take a significantly greater number of medications known to be associated with falls (10 PN group vs 1 C group, p < .01), but the usage pattern among fallers and nonfallers within the PN group suggests that medications were not the primary cause of the falls. The PN subjects who fell demonstrated significantly worse vibratory sense at the ankle and finger (p < .05), and significantly decreased unipedal stance time (3.1 sec vs 9.1 sec, p < .05) than the PN subjects who did not fall. CONCLUSIONS: No associated factors or comorbidities explained the high rate of falls in elderly persons with PN, suggesting that PN is a true risk factor for falls in the elderly. Relatively greater impairment in vibratory sense and ability to maintain unipedal stance may identify those within the PN group who are at a higher risk for falls.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/50a.4.m211

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Richardson, J. K., & Hurvitz, E. A.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
1995-07-01
Volume
50A
Issue
4
Pages
M211-M215
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2149764798
Cited by
324
References
0
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.