The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Attentional Demands and Postural Recovery: The Effects of Aging
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive demands associated with balance and locomotion may contribute to the incidence of falling among older adults. This study addressed issues related to the effects of aging on the attentional demands of recovering from an external disturbance to balance. This research also investigated whether performing a secondary cognitive task differentially affects postural recovery in young versus older adults. METHOD: Fifteen young and 10 healthy older adults were exposed to a series of balance disturbances. Attentional demands were assessed using a dual task paradigm where postural recovery served as the primary task, and counting backwards served as a concurrent secondary cognitive task. The effect of the counting task was assessed by comparing kinematic variables related to feet-in-place and stepping recovery strategies. RESULTS: Recovering upright stance was found to be attentionally demanding in both age groups. The type of recovery strategy did not influence attentional demands in young adults; however, a hierarchy of increasing attentional demands between the ankle strategy and compensatory stepping was apparent among older adults. In addition, stepping appears to be more attentionally demanding for older adults than for younger adults. Counting backwards did not affect the type of strategy used; however, it did affect the kinematics of stepping. For both age groups, steps occurred when the center of mass was located in a more central location within the base of support when the secondary task was added. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to recover a stable posture following an external perturbation is more attentionally demanding for older adults than for younger adults. This would suggest that for some older adults, an increased risk for loss of balance and falls may result if sufficient attentional resources are not allocated to the task of postural recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research
Woollacott, M., & Shumway-Cook, A. (2002) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00156-4 · Cited by 2,690
Self-citationLajoie, Y., & Gallagher, S. P. (2004) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/s0167-4943(03)00082-7 · Cited by 929
Exercise for improving balance in older people
Howe, T. E., Rochester, L., Neil, F., Skelton, D. A., & Ballinger, C. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004963.pub3 · Cited by 809
The clinical utility of posturography
Visser, J. E., Carpenter, M. G., van der Kooij, H., & Bloem, B. R. (2008) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.220 · Cited by 490
Fatores associados a quedas em uma coorte de idosos residentes na comunidade
Perracini, M. R., & Ramos, L. R. (2002) · Revista de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/s0034-89102002000700008 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, L. A., Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. H.
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- M165-M171
- ISSN
- 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-535X
- OpenAlex
- W2114877023
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 45.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attentional Demands and Postural Recovery: The Effects of Aging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gerona/54.4.m165
- The paper
- Brown, L. A., Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. H. (1999). Attentional Demands and Postural Recovery: The Effects of Aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/54.4.m165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.