Identification of Dementia in Medicare Claims Compared to Rigorous Clinical Assessments in African Americans
Open accessAbstract
Background: Evidence indicates the health care system disproportionately misses dementia in African American compared to White individuals. In preliminary data, we examined factors related to dementia identification by the health care system among African Americans. Methods: We leveraged linked Medicare fee-for-service claims and detailed annual cohort evaluations in African Americans from 4 cohorts at Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center. Results: Among 88 African Americans with cognitive impairment (mean = 10 years follow-up), Medicare claims identified dementia <2 years from cohort diagnosis in 55%; 27% were identified 2–9.9 years after cohort diagnosis, and in 18% there was either no claims diagnosis during the study period, or claims identified dementia 10+ years after cohort diagnosis. Claims identification of dementia was related to older age at cohort diagnosis (eg, <2 years between cohort and claims: mean = 82 years; 10+ years/no diagnosis: mean = 77 years, p = .04), lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (<2 years: mean = 24; 10+ years/no diagnosis: mean = 26, p = .04), more depressive symptoms (<2 years: mean = 2.1 symptoms; 10+ years/no diagnosis: mean = 1.2, p = .04), and more comorbidity (<2 years: mean = 5.6 comorbidities; 10+ years/no diagnosis, mean = 3.0, p = .02). Conclusions: Among African Americans, preliminary data indicate the health care system most rapidly identifies dementia in older individuals, with worse cognitive and physical health. The health care system may miss opportunities for early support of African Americans with dementia, and caregivers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Underdiagnosis is higher in Black and Hispanic older adults.
“Some studies indicate that underdiagnosis is higher in Black and Hispanic older adults.”
From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [260]
The Discussion states that African Americans with dementia are disproportionately missed by the health care system, supporting the claim about Black older adults. The paper does not establish higher underdiagnosis among Hispanic older adults; its study examines African American participants. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Grodstein, F., James, B. D., Chen, Y., Capuano, A. W., Power, M. C., Bennett, D. A., Bynum, J. P. W., & Barnes, L. L.
- Affiliations
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- George Washington University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grodstein, Francine
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-09-30
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-535X
- PMC
- PMC10733208
- OpenAlex
- W4387209335
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG79226, R01AG072559, P30AG10161, P30AG72975, R01AG17917, RF1AG22018, R01AG062711, P01AG019783)
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- dementia detection, Medicare claims data, African Americans, racial disparities, cognitive impairment, Mini-Mental State Examination, depressive symptoms, comorbidities, age at diagnosis, Alzheimer's disease
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Black or African American, Dementia, Medicare, Humans, United States, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review