Cited by 118Medication Adherence and ComplianceLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Adherence and Persistence Among Statin Users Aged 65 Years and Over: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Open access
Ofori-Asenso, Richard, Jakhu, Avtar, Zomer, Ella, Curtis, Andrea J, Korhonen, Maarit Jaana, Nelson, Mark, Gambhir, Manoj, Tonkin, Andrew +2 more·2018·The Journals of Gerontology: Series A

Abstract

Background Older people (aged ≥ 65 years) have distinctive challenges with medication adherence. However, adherence and persistence patterns among older statin users have not been comprehensively reviewed. Methods As part of a broader systematic review, we searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, CENTRAL, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database through December 2016 for English articles reporting adherence and/or persistence among older statin users. Data were analyzed via descriptive methods and meta-analysis using random-effect modeling. Results Data from more than 3 million older statin users in 82 studies conducted in over 40 countries were analyzed. At 1-year follow-up, 59.7% (primary prevention 47.9%; secondary prevention 62.3%) of users were adherent (medication possession ratio [MPR] or proportion of days covered [PDC] ≥ 80%). For both primary and secondary prevention subjects, 1-year adherence was worse among individuals aged more than 75 years than those aged 65-75 years. At 3 and ≥10 years, 55.3% and 28.4% of users were adherent, respectively. The proportion of users persistent at 1-year was 76.7% (primary prevention 76.0%; secondary prevention 82.6%). Additionally, 68.1% and 61.2% of users were persistent at 2 and 4 years, respectively. Among new statin users, 48.2% were nonadherent and 23.9% discontinued within the first year. The proportion of statin users who were adherent based on self-report…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glx169

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A random-effects model using a generalized linear mixed model was employed for pooling studies.

    “Given the anticipated statistical heterogeneity, consistent with previous adherence studies,23, 24, 25 we employed a random-effects model using a generalized linear mixed model for pooling studies.”

    From Adherence to PCSK9 Inhibitors in Clinical Practice (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ofori-Asenso, R., Jakhu, A., Zomer, E., Curtis, A. J., Korhonen, M. J., Nelson, M., Gambhir, M., Tonkin, A., Liew, D., & Zoungas, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics (CCRET), Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia
  • STAREE, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Epidemiological Modelling Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Australia
  • Monash Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Zoungas, Sophia
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
Published
2017-09-02
Volume
73
Issue
6
Pages
813-819
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2752445709
Cited by
118
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
statins, medication adherence, treatment persistence, older adults, medication possession ratio, proportion of days covered, primary prevention, secondary prevention, statin discontinuation, cardiovascular disease, self-reported adherence
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review