Cited by 202Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

Selection of Children To Provide Care: The Effect of Earlier Parental Transfers

Henretta, J. C., Hill, M. S., Li, W., Soldo, B. J., Wolf, D. A.·1997·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

We use the first wave of data from the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) study to examine the effects of past parent-to-child financial transfers on selection of a child to provide assistance with basic personal care for unmarried parents. We estimate a fixed-effects conditional logit model and find a positive and significant association between past financial transfers and a child's current helping behavior. The coefficient of past financial transfers is in the direction hypothesized, and its magnitude is 80% as large as that of gender, a well-documented powerful predictor of parental caregiving. There appears to be substantial evidence that earlier parent-to-child financial gifts play a role in determining which child in the family will provide assistance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/52b.special_issue.110

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reciprocity has stronger empirical support than the altruism model in intergenerational family relations.

    “The altruism model is difficult to test, however, and has received little empirical backing (Bianchi et al. 2008, 24-25). Reciprocity has stronger support.”

    From Gendering Reciprocity (2013) · cites this paper as Henretta et al. 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henretta, J. C., Hill, M. S., Li, W., Soldo, B. J., & Wolf, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
Corresponding author
Soldo, B. J.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
1997-05-01
Volume
52B
Issue
Special
Pages
110-119
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2154047732
Cited by
202
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
22.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgetown University
  • National Institute on Aging (UO1 AG-09740, U01AG009740)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
intergenerational financial transfers, personal care assistance, unmarried parents, older adults, gender differences in caregiving, AHEAD study, family caregiving
MeSH terms
Aged, Family, Female, Humans, Income, Male, Models, Theoretical, Parent-Child Relations, Frail Elderly, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review