Cited by 155Retirement, Disability, and EmploymentFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

Pathways to retirement: patterns of labor force participation andlabor market exit among the pre-retirement population by race, Hispanicorigin, and sex

Chenoa A. Flippen, Marta Tienda·2000·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the pre-retirement labor force participation behavior of Black, White, and Hispanic men and women to determine how patterns of labor market exit differ among groups. METHODS: We combine data from the first and second waves of the Health and Retirement Study and apply multinomial logit regression techniques to model labor force status in the first wave of the HRS and change over time. RESULTS: Black, Hispanic, and female elderly persons experience more involuntary job separation in the years immediately prior to retirement, and the resulting periods of joblessness often eventuate in "retirement" or labor force withdrawal. Minority disadvantage in human capital, health, and employment characteristics accounts for a large part of racial and ethnic differences in labor force withdrawal. Nevertheless, Black men and Hispanic women experience more involuntary labor market exits than Whites with similar socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. DISCUSSION: Workers most vulnerable to labor market difficulties during their youth confront formidable obstacles maintaining their desired level of labor force attachment as they approach their golden years. This has significant policy implications for the contours of gender and race/ethnic inequality among elderly persons, particularly as life expectancy and the size of the minority elderly population continue to increase.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/55.1.s14

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flippen, C. A., & Tienda, M.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2000-01-01
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
S14-S27
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2342262769
Cited by
155
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG12857)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
retirement, labor force participation, labour market exit, involuntary job separation, racial and ethnic disparities, Hispanic origin, sex differences, older workers, minority disadvantage, human capital, gender inequality, racial inequality, unemployment
MeSH terms
Aged, Black or African American, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Employment, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Retirement, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Logistic Models, Personnel Downsizing, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review