The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aging, Migration, and Mortality: Current Status of Research on the Hispanic Paradox
Abstract
Objective. We reviewed recent evidence on the apparent Hispanic mortality paradox. Methods. Recent studies using vital statistics, national community surveys linked to the National Death Index, Medicare data linked to application records for social security cards maintained in the Social Security Administration NUDIMENT file, and mortality follow-up by regional studies are reviewed critically. Results. Data based on vital statistics show the greatest mortality advantage compared with non-Hispanic Whites for all Hispanics combined. The advantage is greatest among older people. National Community Surveys linked to the National Death Index show a narrowing of the advantage, and one study suggests that the Mexican Origin mortality advantage can be attributed to selective return migration of less healthy immigrants to Mexico. The Medicare–NUDIMENT data that avoid problems of other data sets also show an advantage in mortality among Hispanic elders, although the advantage is considerably lower than is found using the vital statistics method. Discussion. Although some research has recently begun to question whether indeed all Hispanic groups enjoy a mortality advantage, the majority of the evidence continues to support a mortality advantage at a minimum among Mexican Americans and especially in old age, at least among men, which may provide partial, albeit indirect, support for a selective return migration or “salmon bias” effect. There is a need to further explore the existence of a selective return migration effect with expanded data bases that include more subjects from the various Hispanic origins. To date, the majority of the evidence continues to support the Hispanic paradox at least among people of Mexican origin and calls for additional attention to this interesting and highly important phenomenon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
Duncan, O. D., & Sills, D. L. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092889 · Cited by 3,486
Assimilation in American Life.
Tomasi, S., & Gordon, M. M. (1964) · International Migration Digest · doi:10.2307/3002902 · Cited by 2,672
Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences
(2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-01344-8 · Cited by 1,956
The Latino mortality paradox: a test of the "salmon bias" and healthy migrant hypotheses.
Abraído-Lanza, A. F., Dohrenwend, B. P., Ng-Mak, D. S., & Turner, J. B. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.10.1543 · Cited by 1,159
The health of Hispanics in the southwestern United States: an epidemiologic paradox.
Markides, K. P., & Coreil, J. (1986) · PubMed · Cited by 1,050
Self-citationParadox lost: Explaining the hispanic adult mortality advantage
Palloni, A., & Arias, E. (2004) · Demography · doi:10.1353/dem.2004.0024 · Cited by 897
Understanding the Hispanic paradox.
Franzini, L., Ribble, J. C., & Keddie, A. M. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 757
Manton, K. G., & Gu, X. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.111152298 · Cited by 663
Mortality by Hispanic Status in the United States
Sorlie, P. D. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510200070034 · Cited by 467
Neighborhood Context and Mortality Among Older Mexican Americans: Is There a Barrio Advantage?
Eschbach, K., Ostir, G. V., Patel, K. V., Markides, K. S., & Goodwin, J. S. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.10.1807 · Cited by 430
Self-citation
Cited by
Mosca, L., Benjamin, E. J., Berra, K., Bezanson, J. L., Dolor, R. J., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Newby, L. K., Piña, I. L., Roger, V. L., Shaw, L. J., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31820faaf8 · Cited by 2,143
Understanding Racial-ethnic Disparities in Health: Sociological Contributions
Williams, D. R., & Sternthal, M. (2010) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146510383838 · Cited by 744
Hispanic health in the USA: a scoping review of the literature
Velasco-Mondragon, E., Jimenez, A., Palladino-Davis, A. G., Davis, D., & Escamilla-Cejudo, J. A. (2016) · Public Health Reviews · doi:10.1186/s40985-016-0043-2 · Cited by 514
Racial Bias in Child Protection? A Comparison of Competing Explanations Using National Data
Drake, B., Jolley, J. M., Lanier, P., Fluke, J., Barth, R. P., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2011) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-1710 · Cited by 371
The contribution of a gender perspective to the understanding of migrants’ health: Table 1
Llácer, A., Zunzunegui, M. V., del Amo, J., Mazarrasa, L., & Bolůmar, F. (2007) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2007.061770 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Markides, K. S., & Eschbach, K.
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- Special_Issue_2
- Pages
- S68-S75
- ISSN
- 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5368
- OpenAlex
- W2122830295
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 17.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aging, Migration, and Mortality: Current Status of Research on the Hispanic Paradox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geronb/60.special_issue_2.s68
- The paper
- Markides, K. S., & Eschbach, K. (2005). Aging, Migration, and Mortality: Current Status of Research on the Hispanic Paradox. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.special_issue_2.s68
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.