Cited by 112Aging, Health, and DisabilityInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementRetirement, Disability, and Employment

Cohort Changes in Active Life Expectancy in the U.S. Elderly Population: Experience From the 1982-2004 National Long-Term Care Survey

Manton, K. G., Gu, X., Lowrimore, G. R.·2008·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To understand declines in chronic disability prevalence in the U.S. elderly population, we examined cohort changes in active life expectancy, a health measure relating population disability and longevity dynamics. METHODS: We computed active life expectancy and life expectancy using the six National Long-Term Care Surveys done from 1982 to 2004 and linked to continuous-time Medicare service data for the same time period by using a stochastic process model based on disability scores calculated using grade of membership analyses. We simultaneously estimated continuous-time disability dynamic and mortality functions to calculate life tables for specific disability states and for temporally changing mixtures of disability states. RESULTS: Disability dynamics, measured as changes in grade of membership scores, showed significant variation across two birth cohorts followed for 24 years. Disability dynamics and disability-specific hazard functions were significantly improved in the younger cohort (persons aged 65-74 in 1982). DISCUSSION: Our results, supporting the hypothesis of morbidity compression, indicate that younger cohorts of elderly persons are living longer in better health. The methods describe individual disability transitions and mortality and other factors associated with disability changes, making it possible to better evaluate interventions to promote future declines in disability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/63.5.s269

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 53 · Cited by 112

Authors
Manton, K. G., Gu, X., & Lowrimore, G. R.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
ORCID
Gu, X.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2008-09-01
Volume
63
Issue
5
Pages
S269-S281
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2163102838
Cited by
112
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG01159-31, R01AG001159)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
active life expectancy, cohort differences, chronic disability, disability transitions, mortality, older adults, stochastic modeling, life tables, Medicare, National Long Term Care Survey
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Health Planning, Health Status, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Quality of Life, Stochastic Processes, United States, Cohort Studies, Life Tables, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review