CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 298Aging and Gerontology ResearchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging, Health, and Disability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is It Better to Give or to Receive? Social Support and the Well-being of Older Adults

Thomas, P. A.·2010·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
DOI 10.1093/geronb/gbp113
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVES. This study examines the separate effects of several dimensions of giving and receiving social support on the well-being of older adults, with hypotheses guided by identity theory. METHODS: Data derive from the Social Networks in Adult Life survey, a national probability sample of older adults (N = 689). Ordinary least squares regression was used to examine the impact of total support, size of support network, number of types of support, and types of alter support relationships-both given and received-on well-being. RESULTS: Providing support to others is beneficial to older adults' well-being, as illustrated in the relatively strong, positive associations of total support given, the number of types of support given, and support given to friends and children on well-being. Receiving support was less important to well-being except when received from a spouse or sibling. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this analysis provides support for hypotheses predicted by identity theory, highlights the importance of examining giving and receiving support net of the other, and suggests that it is often better for the well-being of older adults to give than to receive.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbp113

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 2007, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62B, S304
  2. 2006, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61B, P25
  3. 2005, International journal of psychiatry, 20, 512
  4. 1992, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 47, 300
  5. 2006, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61B, P33
  6. 2004, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59B, 173

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 298

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, P. A.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Thomas, P. A.
ORCID
Thomas, P. A.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2009-12-22
Volume
65B
Issue
3
Pages
351-357
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
DOI
10.1093/geronb/gbp113
OpenAlex
W2159896553
Cited by
298
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
social support, older adults, well-being, identity theory, social support networks, support types
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Altruism, Family, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Social Environment, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review