Understanding Elderspeak: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background and Objectives: Elderspeak is an inappropriate simplified speech register that sounds like baby talk and is used with older adults, especially in health care settings. Understanding the concept of elderspeak is challenging due to varying views about which communicative components constitute elderspeak and whether elderspeak is beneficial or harmful for older adults. Research Design and Methods: Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis method was used to evaluate the concept of elderspeak through identification of elderspeak’s attributes, antecedents, and consequences. A systematic search using the PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase databases was completed. Results: Eighty-three theoretical or research articles from 1981 to 2020 were identified. Elderspeak characteristics were categorized by semantic, syntactic, pragmatic, paralinguistic, and nonverbal attributes. The primary antecedent to elderspeak is implicit ageism, in which old age cues and signs of functional or cognitive impairment led to simplified communication, usually from a younger caregiver. Research studies varied in reporting whether elderspeak facilitated or interfered with comprehension by older adults, in part depending on the operational definition of elderspeak and experimental manipulations. Exaggerated prosody, a key feature of elderspeak, was found to reduce comprehension. Elderspeak was generally perceived as patronizing by older adults and speakers were perceived as less respectful. In persons with dementia, elderspeak also increases the probability of resistiveness to care, which is an important correlate of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Discussion and Implications: Based on this concept analysis, a new definition of elderspeak is proposed, in which attributes that have been found to enhance comprehension are differentiated from those that do not. Recommendations for consistent operationalization of elderspeak in future research are made.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Elderspeak communication: impact on dementia care
Williams, K. N., Herman, R., Gajewski, B., & Wilson, K. (2009) · American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/1533317508318472 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Experimentally disentangling what's beneficial about elderspeak from what's not.
Kemper, S., & Harden, T. (1999) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.14.4.656 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Communication with older adults: The influence of age stereotypes, context, and communicator age
HUMMERT, M. L., SHANER, J. L., GARSTKA, T. A., & HENRY, C. (1998) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00439.x · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Elderspeak's influence on resistiveness to care: focus on behavioral events
Herman, R. E., & Williams, K. N. (2009) · American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/1533317509341949 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Shaw, C. A., & Gordon, J. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shaw, Clarissa A
- Venue
- Innovation in Aging
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-07-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- igab023-igab023
- ISSN
- 2399-5300 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8406004
- OpenAlex
- W3113854371
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Innovation in Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Nursing Research (F31NR018580)
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- elderspeak, ageism, older adults, healthcare communication, comprehension, dementia, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, caregiver-patient communication, paralinguistic features
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review