Cited by 3COVID-19 and Mental HealthDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and research

The Relationship Between COVID 19 Anxiety and Dementia Caregivers Burden and Suffering

Open access
Lucas, Kaitlyn, Batista-Malat, Eleanor, Park, Seho, Johns, Shelly, Fowler, Nicole, Judge, Katherine·2021·Innovation in Aging

Abstract

The impact of COVID-19 on dementia caregivers is gaining new interest. It is unknown how the pandemic has impacted caregivers’ burden and existential suffering. Analyses were performed on data for dementia caregivers (n=89) enrolled in the Indiana University Telephone Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Caregivers (TACTICs) pilot trials. Individuals were primary caregivers of a family member with dementia and had clinically significant anxiety measured by a GAD-7 score >10 or between 5-9 with reported interference in life. COVID-19 anxiety was measured using the NIH CoRonavIruS Health Impact Survey (CRISIS) questions. Caregivers were on average 55.2 years of age with 56.2% being child or child-in-law, 71.9% were white and 24.7% were Black. Mean burden scores, measured by the Zarit Burden Index, were higher (44.29) compared to means reported across the literature (26.7) indicating the sample experienced higher than normal levels of burden. Mean existential suffering scores measured by the subscale of Experience of Suffering Scale were lower (9.37) compared to means across the literature (11.5) indicating that overall participants experienced lower levels of existential suffering compared to those in previous studies. A significant relationship was found between COVID-19 anxiety and burden levels (x2= 9.07, p<0.05), with higher levels of COVID-19 anxiety associated with greater burden. A non-significant relationship was found between COVID-19 anxiety and existential suffering (x2=5.99, p=0.11). Results highlight the impact of COVID-19 anxiety as an external stressor on dementia caregiving. and the importance of considering context of external stressors when implementing intervention protocols for caregivers of individuals with dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geroni/igab046.3747

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CRISIS survey was administered only to the second cohort and found a significant relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and caregiver burden overall.

    “The NIH Coronavirus Health Impact Survey (CRISIS) was administered to participants in the second cohort (only) to test for pandemic effects, which found a significant relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and caregiver burden overall(Lucas et al., 2021).”

    From Feasibility and acceptability of a telephone-based ACT intervention for caregivers (TACTICs) of adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD): a randomized pilot during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2025) · cites this paper as Lucas et al., 2021

    The paper’s text (pp. 1049–1050) says COVID-19 anxiety was measured using CRISIS questions and reports a significant association with caregiver burden (χ²=9.07, p<0.05). It describes caregivers enrolled in TACTICs pilot trials but does not say that CRISIS was administered only to a second cohort. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lucas, K., Batista-Malat, E., Park, S., Johns, S., Fowler, N., & Judge, K.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland State University (US)
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Innovation in Aging
Published
2021-12-01
Volume
5
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
1049-1050
ISSN
2399-5300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200616846
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Innovation in Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
COVID-19 anxiety, dementia caregivers, caregiver burden, existential suffering, family caregivers, external stressors, COVID-19 pandemic impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review