Cited by 124Aging and Gerontology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Age and simple reaction time.

Gottsdanker, R.·1982·Journal of Gerontology

Abstract

Although simple reaction time (RT) to a tone showed a statistically significant increase between 18 and 93 years of age in a sample of 220 men and women, the amount of increase was slight, less than 2 msec/decade. Consequently, the appreciable slowing of more typical behavior with age does not seen attributable to some general process in the central nervous system as has been argued. This degree of stability found for simple RT with age, unexpected from the body of previous work, may reflect equivalence of age groups and use of optimal RT technique. In a second study eight old participants (73 to 84 years) matched on the optimal technique with eight young participants (18 to 24 years) were markedly slower with a long constant preparatory interval but not with elimination of timing cues. Together, the two studies show that simple high level of preparation was either easy of impossible to attain. Behavioral slowing with age can result from ineffective control processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronj/37.3.342

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have failed to find significant sex differences.

    “However, other studies have failed to find significant sex differences (Annett and Annett, 1979; Gottsdanker, 1982; Der and Deary, 2006).”

    From Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time (2015) · cites this paper as Gottsdanker, 1982

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gottsdanker, R.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Gottsdanker, R.
Venue
Journal of Gerontology
Published
1982-05-01
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
342-348
ISSN
0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095820092
Cited by
124
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
simple reaction time, aging, age differences, reaction time slowing, preparatory period, central nervous system aging, older adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review