Cited by 182Older Adults Driving StudiesAging and Gerontology ResearchTraffic and Road Safety

Vision, Aging, and Driving: The Problems of Older Drivers

Kline, D. W., Kline, T. J. B., Fozard, J. L., Kosnik, W., Schieber, F., Sekuler, R.·1992·Journal of Gerontology

Abstract

Although there are well-recognized declines in visual functioning with age, their contribution to the problems of older persons on tasks in the natural environment, including driving, are largely unknown. Adults ranging in age from 22-92 years were surveyed in regard to their visual difficulties when driving and performing everyday tasks. The visual problems of drivers increased with age along five different visual dimensions: unexpected vehicles, vehicle speed, dim displays, windshield problems, and sign reading. Several of the age-related visual problems that were reported appear to be related to the types of automobile accidents more common among older drivers. The study also replicated the findings from an earlier investigation of non-driving tasks that showed visual declines with age on five dimensions: visual processing speed, light sensitivity, dynamic vision, near vision and visual search. These findings indicate promising areas of research regarding the effects of visual aging on tasks in the natural environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronj/47.1.p27

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Night driving becomes more difficult for older adults.

    “Night driving becomes more difficult (D. W. Kline et al., 1992).”

    From Design Principles to Accommodate Older Adults (2012) · cites this paper as D. W. Kline et al., 1992

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kline, D. W., Kline, T. J. B., Fozard, J. L., Kosnik, W., Schieber, F., & Sekuler, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
  • Brandeis University (US)
Venue
Journal of Gerontology
Published
1992-01-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
P27-P34
ISSN
0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976221275
Cited by
182
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
23.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
  • Yale University
  • Northwestern University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Older Adults Driving Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
Keywords
visual aging, older drivers, driving performance, age-related visual decline, visual processing speed, photosensitivity, dynamic vision, near vision, visual search, sign reading, vehicle speed, automobile accidents, everyday tasks
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attitude, Automobile Driving, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Vision Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review