Vision, Aging, and Driving: The Problems of Older Drivers
Abstract
Although there are well-recognized declines in visual functioning with age, their contribution to the problems of older persons on tasks in the natural environment, including driving, are largely unknown. Adults ranging in age from 22-92 years were surveyed in regard to their visual difficulties when driving and performing everyday tasks. The visual problems of drivers increased with age along five different visual dimensions: unexpected vehicles, vehicle speed, dim displays, windshield problems, and sign reading. Several of the age-related visual problems that were reported appear to be related to the types of automobile accidents more common among older drivers. The study also replicated the findings from an earlier investigation of non-driving tasks that showed visual declines with age on five dimensions: visual processing speed, light sensitivity, dynamic vision, near vision and visual search. These findings indicate promising areas of research regarding the effects of visual aging on tasks in the natural environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Night driving becomes more difficult for older adults.
“Night driving becomes more difficult (D. W. Kline et al., 1992).”
From Design Principles to Accommodate Older Adults (2012) · cites this paper as D. W. Kline et al., 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grimmer, M., Riener, R., Walsh, C. J., & Seyfarth, A. (2019) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-018-0458-8 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Design Principles to Accommodate Older Adults
Farage, M. A., Miller, K. W., Ajayi, F., & Hutchins, D. (2012) · Global Journal of Health Science · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v4n2p2 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
“Night driving becomes more difficult (D. W. Kline et al., 1992).”
BackgroundAging and cone dark adaptation
Gaffney, A. J., Binns, A. M., & Margrain, T. H. (2012) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/opx.0b013e318263c6b1 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kline, D. W., Kline, T. J. B., Fozard, J. L., Kosnik, W., Schieber, F., & Sekuler, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- National Institute on Aging (US)
- Brandeis University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Gerontology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- P27-P34
- ISSN
- 0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976221275
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 23.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Gerontology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
- Yale University
- Northwestern University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Older Adults Driving Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Keywords
- visual aging, older drivers, driving performance, age-related visual decline, visual processing speed, photosensitivity, dynamic vision, near vision, visual search, sign reading, vehicle speed, automobile accidents, everyday tasks
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attitude, Automobile Driving, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Vision Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review