The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Prospective Study of Postural Balance and Risk of Falling in An Ambulatory and Independent Elderly Population
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An ability to predict risk of future falling is needed in order to target high-risk individuals for preventive intervention. The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of different measures of postural balance to predict risk of falling prospectively in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. METHODS: Balance tests were performed on 100 volunteers (aged 62-96), and falling was then monitored prospectively over a one-year period. The balance testing comprised measurements of: (a) spontaneous postural sway, (b) induced anterior-posterior sway, (c) induced medial-lateral sway, (d) anticipatory adjustments preceding volitional arm movements, (e) timed one-leg stance, and (f) performance on a clinical balance assessment scale. Small pseudorandom platform motions were used to perturb balance in the induced-sway tests. Using force plates, the spontaneous- and induced-sway responses were quantified in terms of the amplitude, speed, and mean frequency of the center-of-pressure displacement; input-output models were also used to parameterize the induced-sway performance. RESULTS: Although a number of measures showed evidence of significant differences between fallers and nonfallers, the differences were most pronounced for measures related to the control of lateral stability. Lateral spontaneous-sway amplitude (blindfolded conditions) was found to be the single best predictor of future falling risk, particularly for the large group of falls that were precipitated by a biomechanical perturbation. This measure was able to predict future falling risk with moderate accuracy, even in those individuals with no recent history of falling. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that control of lateral stability may be an important area for fall-preventative intervention. The ability of a simple and safe force-plate measure of spontaneous postural sway to predict future falling risk suggests a possible clinical application as a preliminary screening tool for risk of falling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A clinical test of stepping and change of direction to identify multiple falling older adults
Dite, W., & Temple, V. A. (2002) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.35469 · Cited by 788
Postural Perturbations: New Insights for Treatment of Balance Disorders
Horak, F. B., Henry, S. M., & Shumway-Cook, A. (1997) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/77.5.517 · Cited by 616
Choice Stepping Reaction Time: A Composite Measure of Falls Risk in Older People
Lord, S. R., & Fitzpatrick, R. C. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/56.10.m627 · Cited by 420
Direction-dependent control of balance during walking and standing
O'Connor, S. M., & Kuo, A. D. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00131.2009 · Cited by 393
Postural control is scaled to level of postural threat
Adkin, A. L., Frank, J. S., Carpenter, M. G., & Peysar, G. W. (2000) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/s0966-6362(00)00057-6 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Maki, B. E., Holliday, P. J., & Topper, A. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Gerontology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-03-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- M72-M84
- ISSN
- 0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013529128
- Cited by
- 1,310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective Study of Postural Balance and Risk of Falling in An Ambulatory and Independent Elderly Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geronj/49.2.m72
- The paper
- Maki, B. E., Holliday, P. J., & Topper, A. K. (1994). A Prospective Study of Postural Balance and Risk of Falling in An Ambulatory and Independent Elderly Population. Journal of Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.2.m72
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.