Cited by 33Aging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesAging, Health, and Disability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transforming Aging Services: Area Agencies on Aging and the COVID-19 Response

Open access
Gallo, Haley B, Wilber, Kathleen H·2021·The Gerontologist

Abstract

For over four decades, Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs) have served as focal points to help older adults remain in their homes and communities. AAAs partner with other organizations to administer services authorized under the Older Americans Act (OAA). AAAs represent loosely coupled systems; they are responsive to guidelines established by the OAA while maintaining flexibility to leverage limited resources, establish partnerships, and create innovative programs to meet community needs. As stay-at-home orders and concern for safety have kept many older adults homebound during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, an important question is how the Aging Network, including the over 600 AAAs, has responded to these rapidly changing needs. Although time and more systematic assessments are required, available information suggests that the loosely coupled network of AAAs has been a key, adaptable resource. This article begins with a description of the Aging Network and its history before turning to how the community-specific, collaborative, and evolving nature of AAAs places them at a unique position to respond to the challenges that arise with COVID-19. It concludes with how AAAs can continue to adapt to meet the needs of older adults and the people who care for them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnaa213

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mather, 2015, Aging in the United States, Population Bulletin, 70

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gallo, H. B., & Wilber, K. H.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Gallo, Haley B
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2020-12-22
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
152-158
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W3116899627
Cited by
33
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Aging (T32 AG000037)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
Area Agencies on Aging, COVID-19 pandemic, Older Americans Act, aging network, older adults, home and community-based services, inter-organizational partnerships, organizational adaptability, stay-at-home orders, long-term care
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Aging, Humans, United States, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review