The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Associations of Special Care Units and Outcomes of Residents With Dementia: 2004 National Nursing Home Survey
Abstract
PURPOSE: We compared the rates of specialized care for residents with Alzheimer's disease or dementia in special care units (SCUs) and other nursing home (NH) units and examined the associations of SCU residence with process of care and resident outcomes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Data came from the 2004 National Nursing Home Survey. The indicators of process of care included physical restraints, continence management, feeding tubes, and influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. Resident outcomes included pressure ulcers, hospitalization, emergency room visits, weight loss, and falls. Analyses were conducted by using Stata SE version 10. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analyses show that SCU residents were more likely to have received specialized dementia care and specialized behavioral problem management. They were less likely to have bed rails (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.39, AOR = 0.35, ps < .01), use catheters (AOR = 0.33, AOR = 0.33, ps < .01), and yet more likely to have toilet plans/bladder training for incontinence control (AOR = 1.90, AOR = 1.62, ps < .01) than those in regular units and those in NHs without an SCU. Moreover, SCU residents were less likely to have pressure ulcers, hospitalization than those in regular units, and less likely to have experienced weight loss than those in NHs without an SCU. However, they were more likely to have falls (AOR = 1.32, AOR = 1.36, ps < .05) than those in regular units and those in NHs without an SCU. IMPLICATIONS: Our study shows that SCU residents had, in general, better process of care than those in regular units and in NHs without an SCU. Further studies are needed to assess specific outcome changes among SCU residents and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of having such units.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Specialization of SCUs results in better organized care compared to traditional nursing homes (n-SCUs) and in more family involvement.
“This specialization results in a better organized care offered by SCUs [8] compared to traditional nursing homes (n-SCUs) and in more family involvement [9].”
From Special Care Units and Traditional Care in Dementia: Relationship with Behavior, Cognition, Functional Status and Quality of Life - A Review (2013) · cites this paper as [8]
Better functional abilities in the SCU group at baseline compared to the n-SCU group were found in 6 studies with large, moderate and small effect sizes or significant p values.
“Better functional abilities in the SCU group at baseline compared to the n-SCU group were found in 6 studies with large [8], moderate [9] and small [27,34,35] effect sizes or significant p values [44].”
From Special Care Units and Traditional Care in Dementia: Relationship with Behavior, Cognition, Functional Status and Quality of Life - A Review (2013) · cites this paper as [8]
A possible explanation for the lack of clear direction in ADL differences is that the studies looked at different functional abilities or levels of disability.
“A possible explanation is that the studies looked at different functional abilities, e.g. transferring, eating, toileting, dressing and bathing [8] or levels of disability [38].”
From Special Care Units and Traditional Care in Dementia: Relationship with Behavior, Cognition, Functional Status and Quality of Life - A Review (2013) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Effects of Residence in Alzheimer Disease Special Care Units on Functional Outcomes
Phillips, C. D. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550160060039 · Cited by 76
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 2009, ALZHEIMERS DEMENTIA, 5, 234, 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.03.001 · DOI
- Castle, 2009, Medical care, 47, 1164, 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181b58a69 · DOI
- Castle, 1998, Medical Care Research and Review, 55, 139, 10.1177/107755879805500201 · DOI
- 1991, Clinical gerontologist, 11, 18
- 2000, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, S234, 10.1093/geronb/55.4.S234 · DOI · Paper page
- Coleman, 1990, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 38, 108, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb03470.x · DOI
- 2008, RESEARCH IN NURSING HEALTH, 31, 238, 10.1002/nur.20249 · DOI
- 1966, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly, 44, 166, 10.2307/3348969 · DOI
- Donabedian, 1980, Medical care review, 37, 653
- Gruneir, 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 199, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01559.x · DOI
- 2000, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, S278, 10.1093/geronb/55.5.S278 · DOI
- Hebert, 2003, Archives of Neurology, 60, 1119, 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119 · DOI · Paper page
- 1992, The Gerontologist, 32, 191, 10.1093/geront/32.2.191 · DOI
- 1990, The Gerontologist, 30, 178, 10.1093/geront/30.2.178 · DOI · Paper page
- Johnson, 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49, 710, 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49146.x · DOI
- 2009, VITAL AND HEALTH STATISTICS, 13, 1
- Konetzka, 2008, Health services research, 43, 1025, 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00803.x · DOI
- 1999, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 14, 270, 10.1177/153331759901400503 · DOI · Paper page
- 1995, The Gerontologist, 35, 179, 10.1093/geront/35.2.179 · DOI
- Miles, 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 1124, 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50271.x · DOI
- 1992, The Gerontologist, 32, 762, 10.1093/geront/32.6.762 · DOI
- Mitchell, 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 75, 10.1034/j.1601-5215.2002.51013.x · DOI
- Parker, 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45, 797, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb01504.x · DOI
- Pfisterer, 2007, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55, 2016, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01457.x · DOI
- Phillips, 2000, American Journal of Public Health, 90, 92, 10.2105/AJPH.90.1.92 · DOI
- Phillips, 1998, Journal of health and human services administration, 20, 300
- Rubenstein, 1996, Clinics in geriatric medicine, 12, 881, 10.1016/S0749-0690(18)30206-4 · DOI
- Sand, 1992, Journal of gerontological nursing, 18, 28, 10.3928/0098-9134-19920301-07 · DOI
- Schnelle, 2004, Health services research, 39, 225, 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00225.x · DOI
- Sidell, 1998, Journal of health & social policy, 9, 29, 10.1300/J045v09n03_03 · DOI
- 1995, The Gerontologist, 35, 103, 10.1093/geront/35.1.103 · DOI
- Sloane, 1991, JAMA, 265, 1278, 10.1001/jama.1991.03460100080028 · DOI
- Smith, 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48, 519, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04998.x · DOI
- Todd, 1997, American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1675, 10.2105/AJPH.87.10.1675 · DOI
- Vu, 2006, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 7, S53, 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.12.016 · DOI
- 1990, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 38, P.A48
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
The Quality of Advanced Dementia Care in the Nursing Home: The Role of Special Care Units
Cadigan, R. O., Grabowski, D. C., Givens, J. L., & Mitchell, S. L. (2012) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31825dd713 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, H., Fang, X., Liao, Y., Elliott, A., & Zhang, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Mount Olive (US)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Corresponding author
- Luo, H.
- Venue
- The Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-05-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 509-518
- ISSN
- 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5341
- OpenAlex
- W2095637360
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- special care units, nursing homes, dementia care, Alzheimer's disease, process of care, pressure ulcers, falls, hospitalization, weight loss, physical restraint, continence management, feeding tube, vaccination, resident outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Patient Care Team, Specialization, United States, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review