The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Importance of Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Social Capital for the Well Being of Older Adults in the Community
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We aimed to investigate whether social capital (obtaining support through indirect ties such as from neighbors) and social cohesion (interdependencies among neighbors) within neighborhoods positively affect the well being of older adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 945 of 1,440 (66% response rate) independently living older adults (aged ≥70 years) in Rotterdam. We fitted a hierarchical random effects model to account for the hierarchical structure of the study design: 945 older adults (Level 1) nested in 72 neighborhoods (Level 2). RESULTS: Univariate analyses showed that being born in the Netherlands, house ownership, education, income, social capital of individuals, neighborhood security, neighborhood services, neighborhood social capital, and neighborhood social cohesion were significantly related to the well being of older adults. Multilevel analyses showed that social capital of individuals, neighborhood services, neighborhood social capital, and neighborhood social cohesion predicted the well being of older adults. Single and poor older adults reported lower well being than did better off and married older adults. However, the effects of marital status and income were mediated by neighborhood services, social capital, and social cohesion. Neighborhood services, social capital, and social cohesion may act as buffer against the adverse effects of being single and poor on the well being of older adults. IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study support the importance of social capital of individuals, as well as social capital within the neighborhood and social cohesion within the neighborhood for well being of older adults. The well being of older adults may also be enhanced through the improvement of quality of neighborhood services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diener, E. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 · Cited by 11,023
Diener, E. (2009) · Social Indicators Research Series · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_2 · Cited by 10,950
Взаимосвязь статуса занятости и пола с уровнем психологического благополучия
М.Р., Н., & С.И., Б. (2026) · Cifra LLC Journals · doi:10.60797/irj.2026.170.43 · Cited by 7,950
The Structure of Psychological Well-Being.
Mechanic, D., & Bradburn, N. M. (1970) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2093340 · Cited by 4,923
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990) · Successful Aging · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665684.003 · Cited by 3,739
Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory
Easterlin, R. A. (2001) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00646 · Cited by 2,521
The Meaning of "Aging in Place" to Older People
Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. S. (2012) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnr098 · Cited by 1,965
Social capital and self-rated health: a contextual analysis.
Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., & Glass, R. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.8.1187 · Cited by 1,856
Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.036 · Cited by 1,780
Will Money Increase Subjective Well-Being?
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1014411319119 · Cited by 1,555 · cited 1×
“This fi nding is consistent with earlier studies showing that the risk of low subjective well being is apparently higher for poor and single individuals ( Cramm et al., 2010 ; Diener & Biswas-Diener, 2002 ).”
Result
Cited by
The Relationship between Social Cohesion and Urban Green Space: An Avenue for Health Promotion
Jennings, V., & Bamkole, O. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16030452 · Cited by 1,028
The Role of Age-Friendly Environments on Quality of Life among Thai Older Adults
Tiraphat, S., Peltzer, K., Thamma-Aphiphol, K., & Suthisukon, K. (2017) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph14030282 · Cited by 70
Chen, S., Sun, Y., & Seo, B. K. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192316170 · Cited by 38
Social cohesion and health in old age: a study in southern Taiwan
Chen, W., Okumiya, K., Wada, T., Sakamoto, R., Imai, H., Ishimoto, Y., Kimura, Y., Fukutomi, E., Fujisawa, M., Shih, H.-I., et al. (2015) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610214002907 · Cited by 27
Modeling the Neighborhood Wellbeing of Townships in South Africa
Moghayedi, A., Mehmood, A., Michell, K., & Ekpo, C. O. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15118542 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Cramm, J. M., van Dijk, H. M., & Nieboer, A. P.
- Venue
- The Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-04-30
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 142-152
- ISSN
- 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5341
- OpenAlex
- W2153917516
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 18.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Importance of Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Social Capital for the Well Being of Older Adults in the Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geront/gns052
- The paper
- Cramm, J. M., van Dijk, H. M., & Nieboer, A. P. (2013). The Importance of Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Social Capital for the Well Being of Older Adults in the Community. The Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.