The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Social Support for Older Adults Through Technology: Findings From the PRISM Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: Information and communication technology holds promise in terms of providing support and reducing isolation among older adults. We evaluated the impact of a specially designed computer system for older adults, the Personal Reminder Information and Social Management (PRISM) system. Design, Setting, and Participants: The trial was a multisite randomized field trial conducted at 3 sites. PRISM was compared to a Binder condition wherein participants received a notebook that contained paper content similar to that contained in PRISM. The sample included 300 older adults at risk for social isolation who lived independently in the community (Mage = 76.15 years). Primary outcome measures included indices of social isolation, social support, loneliness, and well-being. Secondary outcome measures included indices of computer proficiency and attitudes toward technology. Data were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months post-randomization. Results: The PRISM group reported significantly less loneliness and increased perceived social support and well-being at 6 months. There was a trend indicating a decline in social isolation. Group differences were not maintained at 12 months, but those in the PRISM condition still showed improvements from baseline. There was also an increase in computer self-efficacy, proficiency, and comfort with computers for PRISM participants at 6 and 12 months. Discussion: The findings suggest that access to technology applications such as PRISM may enhance social connectivity and reduce loneliness among older adults and has the potential to change attitudes toward technology and increase technology self-efficacy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · Brain and nerve · Cited by 21,012
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J. M., & Wouters, E. J. M. (2016) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,690
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 18,909
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Ellis, 2001, What causes mental illness, 43
- Kahana, 1996, Conceptual and empirical advances in understanding aging well through proactive adaptation, 18
- Ortman, 2014, An aging nation: The older population in the United States
- Rainie, 2016, Digital divides 2016
- Smith, 2014, Older adults and technology use: Adoption is increasing, but many seniors remain isolated from digital life
- Wall, 1998, Clinical Gerontologist, 19, 39, 10.1300/J018v19n01_04 · doi:10.1300/j018v19n01_04
- Wilkinson, 1993, Wide Range Achievement Test—third revision
Cited by
Xie, B., Charness, N., Fingerman, K., Kaye, J., Kim, M. T., & Khurshid, A. (2020) · Journal of Aging & Social Policy · doi:10.1080/08959420.2020.1771237 · Cited by 346
Self-citationTechnology Adoption by Older Adults: Findings From the PRISM Trial
Mitzner, T. L., Savla, J., Boot, W. R., Sharit, J., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Rogers, W. A. (2019) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gny113 · Cited by 311
Self-citationHoang, P., King, J. A., Moore, S., Moore, K., Reich, K., Sidhu, H., Tan, C. V., Whaley, C., & McMillan, J. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36676 · Cited by 315
Factors Predicting Decisions About Technology Adoption Among Older Adults
Berkowsky, R. W., Sharit, J., & Czaja, S. J. (2017) · Innovation in Aging · doi:10.1093/geroni/igy002 · Cited by 308
Self-citationSzabo, A., Allen, J., Stephens, C., & Alpass, F. (2019) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gny036 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J.
- Venue
- The Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-02-15
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 467-477
- ISSN
- 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5341
- OpenAlex
- W2588831670
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 43.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging
- National Institutes of Health (NIA 3 PO1 AG017211)
- Project CREATE III – Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Social Support for Older Adults Through Technology: Findings From the PRISM Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geront/gnw249
- The paper
- Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2018). Improving Social Support for Older Adults Through Technology: Findings From the PRISM Randomized Controlled Trial. The Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.