Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving Social Support for Older Adults Through Technology: Findings From the PRISM Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Czaja, Sara J, Boot, Walter R, Charness, Neil, Rogers, Wendy A, Sharit, Joseph·2018·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Objectives: Information and communication technology holds promise in terms of providing support and reducing isolation among older adults. We evaluated the impact of a specially designed computer system for older adults, the Personal Reminder Information and Social Management (PRISM) system. Design, Setting, and Participants: The trial was a multisite randomized field trial conducted at 3 sites. PRISM was compared to a Binder condition wherein participants received a notebook that contained paper content similar to that contained in PRISM. The sample included 300 older adults at risk for social isolation who lived independently in the community (Mage = 76.15 years). Primary outcome measures included indices of social isolation, social support, loneliness, and well-being. Secondary outcome measures included indices of computer proficiency and attitudes toward technology. Data were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months post-randomization. Results: The PRISM group reported significantly less loneliness and increased perceived social support and well-being at 6 months. There was a trend indicating a decline in social isolation. Group differences were not maintained at 12 months, but those in the PRISM condition still showed improvements from baseline. There was also an increase in computer self-efficacy, proficiency, and comfort with computers for PRISM participants at 6 and 12 months. Discussion: The findings suggest that access to technology applications such as PRISM may enhance social connectivity and reduce loneliness among older adults and has the potential to change attitudes toward technology and increase technology self-efficacy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnw249

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ellis, 2001, What causes mental illness, 43
  2. Kahana, 1996, Conceptual and empirical advances in understanding aging well through proactive adaptation, 18
  3. Ortman, 2014, An aging nation: The older population in the United States
  4. Rainie, 2016, Digital divides 2016
  5. Smith, 2014, Older adults and technology use: Adoption is increasing, but many seniors remain isolated from digital life
  6. Wall, 1998, Clinical Gerontologist, 19, 39, 10.1300/J018v19n01_04 · doi:10.1300/j018v19n01_04
  7. Wilkinson, 1993, Wide Range Achievement Test—third revision

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2017-02-15
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
467-477
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2588831670
Cited by
466
References
43
FWCI
43.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Institutes of Health (NIA 3 PO1 AG017211)
  • Project CREATE III – Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Social Support for Older Adults Through Technology: Findings From the PRISM Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geront/gnw249
The paper
Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2018). Improving Social Support for Older Adults Through Technology: Findings From the PRISM Randomized Controlled Trial. The Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw249

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.