Cited by 229Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

How Effective Are Dementia Caregiver Interventions? An Updated Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Walter, Erik, Pinquart, Martin·2020·The Gerontologist

Abstract

Background and objectives Caring for a person with dementia places a significant burden upon informal caregivers and leads to decreased psychological and physical health, which is why dementia caregiver interventions have been developed. However, empirical evidence for the efficacy of those interventions is inconclusive and the last comprehensive meta-analysis (Pinquart & Sörensen. Helping caregivers of persons with dementia: Which interventions work and how large are their effects? International Psychogeriatrics. 2006;18(4), 577-595.) was published more than 10 years ago. Research design and method This meta-analysis aims to update the meta-analysis conducted by Pinquart and Sörensen. Based on a systematic search in electronic data bases, effects of 282 controlled studies were integrated. The effectiveness of different intervention types and influences of study characteristics were evaluated. Results Interventions had, on average, a significant, small-to-moderate effect on the improvement of ability/knowledge, subjective well-being, burden, depression, and the caregiver's anxiety as well as symptoms of the care recipient. No mean effect was found in regard to reducing the risk of institutionalization. Most intervention types had an effect on the reduction of burden as well as on other outcomes. Psychoeducation and multicomponent interventions affected most outcomes, whereas the efficacy of other intervention types was domain-specific. Discussion and implications There is evi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/gnz118

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 48 · Cited by 229

Authors
Walter, E., & Pinquart, M.
Affiliations
Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Walter, Erik
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2019-09-17
Volume
60
Issue
8
Pages
e609-e619
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W3107678106
Cited by
229
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
dementia, informal caregivers, caregiver interventions, caregiver burden, psychoeducation, multicomponent intervention, caregiver depression, caregiver anxiety, institutionalization, caregiver knowledge, subjective well-being
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Dementia, Humans, Institutionalization, Quality of Life, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review