The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PhaseNet: A Deep-Neural-Network-Based Seismic Arrival Time Picking Method
Open accessAbstract
As the number of seismic sensors grows, it is becoming increasingly difficult for analysts to pick seismic phases manually and comprehensively, yet such efforts are fundamental to earthquake monitoring. Despite years of improvements in automatic phase picking, it is difficult to match the performance of experienced analysts. A more subtle issue is that different seismic analysts may pick phases differently, which can introduce bias into earthquake locations. We present a deep-neural-network-based arrival-time picking method called “PhaseNet” that picks the arrival times of both P and S waves. Deep neural networks have recently made rapid progress in feature learning, and with sufficient training, have achieved super-human performance in many applications. PhaseNet uses three-component seismic waveforms as input and generates probability distributions of P arrivals, S arrivals and noise as output. We engineer PhaseNet such that peaks in the probability distributions provide accurate arrival times for both P and S waves. PhaseNet is trained on the prodigious available data set provided by analyst-labelled P and S arrival times from the Northern California Earthquake Data Center. The data set we use contains more than 700 000 waveform samples extracted from over 30 yr of earthquake recordings. We demonstrate that PhaseNet achieves much higher picking accuracy and recall rate than existing methods when applied to the waveforms of known earthquakes, which has the potential to increase the number of S-wave observations dramatically over what is currently available. This will enable both improved locations and improved shear wave velocity models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation
Powers, D. M. W. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.16061 · Cited by 5,440
Learning Deconvolution Network for Semantic Segmentation
Noh, H., Hong, S., & Han, B. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.178 · Cited by 4,422
ObsPy: A Python Toolbox for Seismology
Beyreuther, M., Barsch, R., Krischer, L., Megies, T., Behr, Y., & Wassermann, J. (2010) · Seismological Research Letters · doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530 · Cited by 1,786
Automatic earthquake recognition and timing from single traces
Allen, R. V. (1978) · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · doi:10.1785/bssa0680051521 · Cited by 1,319
An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events
Baer, M., & Kradolfer, U. (1987) · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · doi:10.1785/bssa0770041437 · Cited by 460
Automatic picking of P and S phases using a neural tree
Gentili, S., & Michelini, A. (2006) · Journal of Seismology · doi:10.1007/s10950-006-2296-6 · Cited by 175
Cited by
Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience
Bergen, K. J., Johnson, P. A., de Hoop, M. V., & Beroza, G. C. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau0323 · Cited by 1,249
Self-citationSearching for hidden earthquakes in Southern California
Ross, Z. E., Trugman, D. T., Hauksson, E., & Shearer, P. M. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw6888 · Cited by 331
Li, W., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2022) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi11070385 · Cited by 147
Seismic techniques and suggested instrumentation to monitor volcanoes
Thelen, W. A., Lyons, J. J., Wech, A. G., Moran, S. C., Haney, M. M., & Flinders, A. F. (2024) · Scientific Investigations Report · doi:10.3133/sir20245062b · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, W., & Beroza, G. C.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-10-13
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2794417179
- Cited by
- 1,120
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 32.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PhaseNet: A Deep-Neural-Network-Based Seismic Arrival Time Picking Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gji/ggy423
- The paper
- Zhu, W., & Beroza, G. C. (2018). PhaseNet: A Deep-Neural-Network-Based Seismic Arrival Time Picking Method. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy423
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.