The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning electromagnetic inversion with convolutional neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Geophysical inversion attempts to estimate the distribution of physical properties in the Earth’s interior from observations collected at or above the surface. Inverse problems are commonly posed as least-squares optimization problems in high-dimensional parameter spaces. Existing approaches are largely based on deterministic gradient-based methods, which are limited by non-linearity and non-uniqueness of the inverse problem. Probabilistic inversion methods, despite their great potential in uncertainty quantification, still remain a formidable computational task. In this paper, I explore the potential of deep learning (DL) methods for electromagnetic (EM) inversion. This approach does not require calculation of the gradient and, once the network is trained, provides results instantaneously. Deep neural networks based on fully convolutional architecture are trained on large synthetic data sets obtained by full 3-D simulations. The performance of the method is demonstrated on models of strong practical relevance representing an onshore controlled source electromagnetic CO2 monitoring scenario. The pre-trained networks can reliably estimate the position and lateral dimensions of the anomalies, as well as their resistivity properties. Several fully convolutional network architectures are compared in terms of their accuracy, generalization and cost of training. Examples with different survey geometry and noise levels confirm the feasibility of the DL inversion, opening the possibility to estimate the subsurface resistivity distribution in real time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Automatic microseismic event picking via unsupervised machine learning
Chen, Y. (2017) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggx420 · Cited by 117
RetractedDeep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation
Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., & Cipolla, R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2644615 · Cited by 19,631
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993.341010 · Cited by 14,265
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.57702/o9raffed · Cited by 14,214
Metadata
- Authors
- Puzyrev, V.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-05-02
- Volume
- 218
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 817-832
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2906386705
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 18.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning electromagnetic inversion with convolutional neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gji/ggz204
- The paper
- Puzyrev, V. (2019). Deep learning electromagnetic inversion with convolutional neural networks. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.