The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The influence of glucan polymer structure and solution conformation on binding to (1->3)- -D-glucan receptors in a human monocyte-like cell line
Abstract
Glucans are (1-3)-beta-D-linked polymers of glucose that are produced as fungal cell wall constituents and are also released into the extracellular milieu. Glucans modulate immune function via macrophage participation. The first step in macrophage activation by (1-3)-beta-D-glucans is thought to be the binding of the polymer to specific macrophage receptors. We examined the binding/uptake of a variety of water soluble (1-3)-beta-D-glucans and control polymers with different physicochemical properties to investigate the relationship between polymer structure and receptor binding in the CR3- human promonocytic cell line, U937. We observed that the U937 receptors were specific for (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan binding, since mannan, dextran, or barley glucan did not bind. Scleroglucan exhibited the highest binding affinity with an IC(50)of 23 nM, three orders of magnitude greater than the other (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan polymers examined. The rank order competitive binding affinities for the glucan polymers were scleroglucan>>>schizophyllan > laminarin > glucan phosphate > glucan sulfate. Scleroglucan also exhibited a triple helical solution structure (nu = 1.82, beta = 0.8). There were two different binding/uptake sites on U937 cells. Glucan phosphate and schizophyllan interacted nonselectively with the two sites. Scleroglucan and glucan sulfate interacted preferentially with one site, while laminarin interacted preferentially with the other site. These data indicate that U937 cells have at least two non-CR3 receptor(s) which specifically interact with (1-->3)-beta-D-glucans and that the triple helical solution conformation, molecular weight and charge of the glucan polymer may be important determinants in receptor ligand interaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brown, G. D., & Gordon, S. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35092620 · Cited by 1,579
Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: revisiting our understanding.
Wells, M. L., Potin, P., Craigie, J. S., Raven, J. A., Merchant, S. S., Helliwell, K. E., Smith, A. G., Camire, M. E., & Brawley, S. H. (2017) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-016-0974-5 · Cited by 1,562
An insight into anti-inflammatory effects of natural polysaccharides
Hou, C., Chen, L., Yang, L., & Ji, X. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.315 · Cited by 580
Ganoderma lucidum: A Potent Pharmacological Macrofungus
Sanodiya, B., Thakur, G., Baghel, R., Prasad, G., & Bisen, P. (2009) · Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · doi:10.2174/138920109789978757 · Cited by 470
Antiinflammatory and Immunomodulating Properties of FungalMetabolites
Lull, C., Wichers, H. J., & Savelkoul, H. F. J. (2005) · Mediators of Inflammation · doi:10.1155/mi.2005.63 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, A., Raptis, J., Rice, P. J., Kalbfleisch, J. H., Stout, R. D., Ensley, H. E., Browder, W., & Williams, D. L.
- Venue
- Glycobiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 339-346
- ISSN
- 0959-6658 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2423
- OpenAlex
- W2161054210
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of glucan polymer structure and solution conformation on binding to (1->3)- -D-glucan receptors in a human monocyte-like cell line. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/glycob/10.4.339
- The paper
- Mueller, A., Raptis, J., Rice, P. J., Kalbfleisch, J. H., Stout, R. D., Ensley, H. E., Browder, W., & Williams, D. L. (2000). The influence of glucan polymer structure and solution conformation on binding to (1->3)- -D-glucan receptors in a human monocyte-like cell line. Glycobiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/10.4.339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.