The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein glycosylation: nature, distribution, enzymatic formation, and disease implications of glycopeptide bonds
Abstract
Formation of the sugar-amino acid linkage is a crucial event in the biosynthesis of the carbohydrate units of glycoproteins. It sets into motion a complex series of posttranslational enzymatic steps that lead to the formation of a host of protein-bound oligosaccharides with diverse biological functions. These reactions occur throughout the entire phylogenetic spectrum, ranging from archaea and eubacteria to eukaryotes. It is the aim of this review to describe the glycopeptide linkages that have been found to date and specify their presence on well-characterized glycoproteins. A survey is also made of the enzymes involved in the formation of the various glycopeptide bonds as well as the site of their intracellular action and their affinity for particular peptide domains is evaluated. This examination indicates that 13 different monosaccharides and 8 amino acids are involved in glycoprotein linkages leading to a total of at least 41 bonds, if the anomeric configurations, the phosphoglycosyl linkages, as well as the GPI (glycophosphatidylinositol) phosphoethanolamine bridge are also considered. These bonds represent the products of N- and O-glycosylation, C-mannosylation, phosphoglycation, and glypiation. Currently at least 16 enzymes involved in their formation have been identified and in many cases cloned. Their intracellular site of action varies and includes the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, cytosol, and nucleus. With the exception of the Asn-linked carbohydrate and the GPI anchor, which are transferred to the polypeptide en bloc, the sugar-amino acid linkages are formed by the enzymatic transfer of an activated monosaccharide directly to the protein. This review also deals briefly with glycosidases, which are involved in physiologically important cleavages of glycopeptide bonds in higher organisms, and with a number of human disease states in which defects in enzymatic transfer of saccharides to protein have been implicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parthasarathy, N., & Spiro, R. G. (1984) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)90809-4 · Cited by 99
Self-citation
Cited by
The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism
Pavlova, N. N., & Thompson, C. B. (2016) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006 · Cited by 5,926
Varki, A. (2017) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/cww086 · Cited by 2,635
Glycosylation in health and disease
Reily, C., Stewart, T. J., Renfrow, M. B., & Novak, J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-019-0129-4 · Cited by 2,075
Guvench, O., Mallajosyula, S. S., Raman, E. P., Hatcher, E., Vanommeslaeghe, K., Foster, T. J., Jamison, F. W., & MacKerell, A. D. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct200328p · Cited by 699
Hart, G. W., & Copeland, R. J. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.008 · Cited by 643
Metadata
- Authors
- Spiro, R. G.
- Venue
- Glycobiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 43R-56R
- ISSN
- 0959-6658 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2423
- OpenAlex
- W2117398821
- Cited by
- 1,409
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein glycosylation: nature, distribution, enzymatic formation, and disease implications of glycopeptide bonds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/glycob/12.4.43r
- The paper
- Spiro, R. G. (2002). Protein glycosylation: nature, distribution, enzymatic formation, and disease implications of glycopeptide bonds. Glycobiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/12.4.43r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.