Distinct Genetic Determinants of Plasma Inflammatory Proteins in Tanzanian and Dutch Populations
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the genetic regulation of plasma inflammatory proteins is essential for bridging the gap between genetics and disease biology. While studies in European populations have highlighted significant genetic influences on inflammatory protein levels, African populations remain underrepresented in immunogenetic research. Here, we compare the genetic determinants of 72 inflammatory proteins quantified using the Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel in two cohorts from the Human Functional Genomics Project. The study included 286 healthy Tanzanians (146 males and 140 females) and 340 Dutch participants (175 males and 165 females). Genotyping was conducted using the Illumina Global Screening Array (GSA) for the Tanzanian cohort and the HumanOmniExpressExome-8 for the Dutch cohort. Our genome-wide protein quantitative trait locus (pQTL) analysis identified 10 genome-wide significant FDR-corrected pQTLs in each population, including a missense variant affecting cluster of differentiation 6 (CD6) concentrations, which is implicated in multiple autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. We identified three trans- and seven cis-pQTLs in the Tanzanian cohort, while three cis- and seven trans-pQTLs were identified in the Dutch cohort. However, we observed minimal overlap (< 2%) in pQTLs between the two populations, with colocalization analysis confirming only nine shared loci. Additionally, we replicated several pQTLs identified in the UK-BIOBANK study across African and European ancestries. These findings underscore the genetic diversity underlying inflammatory protein regulation and highlight the importance of population-specific studies to better understand immune function, disease susceptibility, and tailored health interventions across diverse ancestries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
- Authors
- Amour, C., Boahen, C. K., Temba, G. S., Vadaq, N., Kullaya, V., Mmbaga, B. T., Joosten, L. A. B., Kavishe, R. A., Netea, M. G., de Mast, Q., & Kumar, V.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine, Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases, , 6500 HB Nijmegen, The
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (TZ)
- Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
- KCMC University Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, , 25116 Moshi,
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Nitte University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kumar, Vinod
- ORCID
- Venue
- Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2026-10-07
- ISSN
- 1672-0229 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-3244
- OpenAlex
- W7220863715
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Keywords
- protein quantitative trait loci, Tanzanian population, Dutch population, CD6, cis-pQTL, colocalization analysis, genetic diversity, immune function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review