Cited by 15Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentHealthcare Policy and ManagementSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

US payment policy for medications to treat opioid use disorder: landscape and opportunities

Open access

Abstract

Offering patients medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is the standard of care for opioid use disorder (OUD), but an estimated 75%–90% of people with OUD who could benefit from MOUD do not receive medication. Payment policy, defined as public and private payers’ approaches to covering and reimbursing providers for MOUD, is 1 contributor to this treatment gap. We conducted a policy analysis and qualitative interviews (n = 21) and surveys (n = 31) with US MOUD payment policy experts to characterize MOUD insurance coverage across major categories of US insurers and identify opportunities for reform and innovation. Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid all provide coverage for at least 1 formulation of buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone for OUD. Private insurance coverage varies by carrier and by plan, with methadone most likely to be excluded. The experts interviewed cautioned against rigid reimbursement models that force patients into one-size-fits-all care and endorsed future development and adoption of value-based MOUD payment models. More than 70% of experts surveyed reported that Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers should increase payment for office- and opioid treatment program–based MOUD. Validation of MOUD performance metrics is needed to support future value-based initiatives.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/haschl/qxae024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding that 43.0% of SUD service utilizations were self-pay is consistent with documented barriers to SUD treatment, including lack of insurance, inadequate coverage benefits, cash-only payment acceptance, and patients' self-pay preference due to stigma-related privacy concerns.

    “our finding that 43.0% of SUD service utilizations were self-pay is consistent with documented barriers to SUD treatment, including lack of insurance,24 inadequate coverage benefits across various insurance types,24, 31-36 cash-only payment acceptance (i.e., non-acceptance of any insurance) by SUD treatment providers,36 and patients’ self-pay preference due to stigma-related privacy concerns.24”
  • Utilization management strategies are commonly used in Medicaid and private insurance plans to regulate SUD treatment benefits through mechanisms such as prior authorization, drug testing, annual maximums, duration restrictions, high deductibles, and monthly caps on total prescriptions.

    “Moreover, utilization management strategies are commonly used in Medicaid and private insurance plans to regulate SUD treatment benefits through mechanisms such as prior authorization, drug testing, annual maximums, duration restrictions, high deductibles, and monthly caps on total prescriptions,24, 26, 34-35”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2019, Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Save Lives
  2. Levander, 2022, COVID-19-related policy changes for methadone take-home dosing: a multistate survey of opioid treatment program leadership, Subst Abus, 43, 633, 10.1080/08897077.2021.1986768 · DOI
  3. Krawczyk, 2022, Has the treatment gap for opioid use disorder narrowed in the US? A yearly assessment from 2010 to 2019, Int J Drug Policy, 110, 103786, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103786 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Mauro, 2022, Use of medication for opioid use disorder among US adolescents and adults with need for opioid treatment, 2019, JAMA Netw Open, 5, e223821, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3821 · DOI
  5. Lee, 2018, Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X: BOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 391, 309, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32812-X · DOI · Paper page
  6. Degenhardt, 2023, Buprenorphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid dependence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies, Lancet Psychiatry, 10, 386, 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00095-0 · DOI
  7. Madden, 2021, Intervention stigma toward medications for opioid use disorder: a systematic review, Subst Use Misuse, 56, 2181, 10.1080/10826084.2021.1975749 · DOI
  8. McBain, 2020, Growth and distribution of buprenorphine-waivered providers in the United States, 2007–2017, Ann Intern Med, 172, 504, 10.7326/M19-2403 · DOI
  9. Madras, 2020, Improving access to evidence-based medical treatment for opioid use disorder: strategies to address key barriers within the treatment system, NAM Perspect, 2020, 10.31478/202004b · DOI
  10. Buck, 2011, The looming expansion and transformation of public substance abuse treatment under the Affordable Care Act, Health Aff (Millwood), 30, 1402, 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0480 · DOI
  11. Eisenberg, 2022, The impact of HDHPs on service use and spending for substance use disorders, Am J Managed Care, 28, 530, 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89250 · DOI
  12. Palinkas, 2011, Mixed method designs in implementation research, Adm Policy Ment Health, 38, 44, 10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z · DOI · Paper page
  13. Bowser, 2023, New methadone treatment regulations should be complemented by payment and financing reform, Health Affairs Forefront
  14. Hodgkin, 2021, Financial sustainability of payment models for office-based opioid treatment in outpatient clinics, Addict Sci Clin Pract, 16, 45, 10.1186/s13722-021-00253-7 · DOI
  15. Polsky, 2020, Innovative payment to scale up access to medications for opioid use disorder, Am J Manag Care, 26, 286, 10.37765/ajmc.2020.43747 · DOI
  16. Brooklyn, 2017, Vermont hub-and-spoke model of care for opioid use disorder: development, implementation, and impact, J Addict Med, 11, 286, 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000310 · DOI
  17. Miele, 2020, Implementation of the hub and spoke model for opioid use disorders in California: rationale, design and anticipated impact, J Subst Abuse Treat, 108, 20, 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.07.013 · DOI
  18. Clemans-Cope, 2017, Experiences of three states implementing the Medicaid health home model to address opioid use disorder—case studies in Maryland, Rhode Island, and Vermont, J Subst Abuse Treat, 83, 27, 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.10.001 · DOI
  19. Soper, 2017, Moving Toward Value-Based Payment for Medicaid Behavioral Health Services
  20. Mark, 2021, Prior authorization for opioid use disorder versus pain medications: lessons learned for parity enforcement, J Stud Alcohol Drugs, 82, 214, 10.15288/jsad.2021.82.214 · DOI
  21. Andraka-Christou, 2023, Buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder: comparison of insurance restrictions, 2017–21: study examines insurance restrictions on buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder, Health Aff (Millwood), 42, 658, 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01513 · DOI
  22. Andraka-Christou, 2023, Prior authorization restrictions on medications for opioid use disorder: trends in state laws from 2005 to 2019, Ann Med, 55, 514, 10.1080/07853890.2023.2171107 · DOI
  23. Morgan, 2022, Potential barriers to filling buprenorphine and naltrexone prescriptions among a retrospective cohort of individuals with opioid use disorder, J Subst Abuse Treat, 133, 108540, 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108540 · DOI
  24. Shoulders, 2023, Changes in Medicaid fee-for-service benefit design for substance use disorder treatment during the opioid crisis, 2014 to 2021, JAMA Health Forum, 4, e232502, 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.2502 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Dunphy, 2021, Do out-of-pocket costs influence retention and adherence to medications for opioid use disorder?, Drug Alcohol Depend, 225, 108784, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108784 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Morgan, 2022, Variation in initiation, engagement, and retention on medications for opioid use disorder based on health insurance plan design, Med Care, 60, 256, 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001689 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Clemans-Cope, 2022, Medicaid professional fees for treatment of opioid use disorder varied widely across states and were substantially below fees paid by Medicare in 2021, Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy, 17, 49, 10.1186/s13011-022-00478-y · DOI
  28. Polsky, 2020, Private coverage of methadone in outpatient treatment programs, Psychiatr Serv, 71, 303, 10.1176/appi.ps.201900373 · DOI
  29. Ku, 2005, The Effect of Increased Cost-Sharing in Medicaid: A Summary of Research Findings
  30. Abraham, 2022, Coverage and prior authorization policies for medications for opioid use disorder in Medicaid managed care, JAMA Health Forum, 3, e224001, 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4001 · DOI
  31. Nguyen, 2022, Trends in buprenorphine coverage and prior authorization requirements in US commercial formularies, 2017-2021, JAMA Health Forum, 3, e221821, 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1821 · DOI
  32. Williams, 2023, Performance measurement for opioid use disorder medication treatment and care retention, Am J Psychiatry, 180, 454, 10.1176/appi.ajp.20220456 · DOI
  33. Dowd, 2022, Development and validation of a claim-based provider-level measurement of use of medications to treat opioid use disorder, J Subst Abuse Treat, 140, 108824, 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108824 · DOI
  34. Pincus, 2023, Value-based payment and behavioral health, JAMA Psychiatry, 80, 6, 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.3538 · DOI
  35. Keast, 2018, Effects of a prior authorization policy for extended-release/long-acting opioids on utilization and outcomes in a state Medicaid program, Addiction, 113, 1651, 10.1111/add.14248 · DOI
  36. Allen, 2022, The Consequences of Removing Prior Authorization for Buprenorphine in Medicaid—Building an Evidence Base, e220189
  37. Keshwani, 2022, Buprenorphine Use Trends Following Removal of Prior Authorization Policies for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in 2 State Medicaid Programs, e221757
  38. Meiselbach, 2023, State policy and the breadth of buprenorphine-prescriber networks in Medicaid managed care, Med Care Res Rev, 80, 423, 10.1177/10775587231167514 · DOI
  39. Tang, 2022, How emerging telehealth models challenge policymaking, Milbank Q, 100, 650, 10.1111/1468-0009.12584 · DOI
  40. Kleinman, 2022, Office-based methadone prescribing for opioid use disorder: the Canadian model, J Addict Med, 16, 499, 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000950 · DOI
  41. Weinrich, 2000, Provision of methadone treatment in primary care medical practices: review of the Scottish experience and implications for US policy, JAMA, 283, 1343, 10.1001/jama.283.10.1343 · DOI
  42. Joudrey, 2020, Methadone for opioid use disorder—decades of effectiveness but still miles away in the US, JAMA Psychiatry, 77, 1105, 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1511 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McGinty, E. E., White, S. A., Eisenberg, M. D., Palmer, N. R., Brown, C. H., & Saloner, B. K.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
McGinty, Emma E
Venue
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2024-02-27
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
qxae024-qxae024
ISSN
2976-5390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392185526
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Health Affairs Scholar (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • National Institutes of Health (P50DA054072, U2CDA057717)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
opioid use disorder, medication-assisted treatment, payment policy, insurance coverage, reimbursement, buprenorphine, naltrexone, methadone, treatment gap, value-based payment, Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, opioid treatment programs, performance indicators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review