The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence and correlates of 'catastrophic' maternal health care expenditure in India
Open accessAbstract
Using data from the 60(th) round of the National Sample Survey of India (2004), the study investigates the incidence and correlates of 'catastrophic' maternal expenditure (ME) in India. Data on ME come from 6879 births that took place during 365 days prior to the survey. The study adapts earlier definitions and methods for catastrophic total health care expenditure to measure 'catastrophic' ME as: (i) maternal health care expenditure more than 10% of the annual normative household consumption expenditure (ME-1), and (ii) maternal health care expenditure more than 40% of the annual 'capacity to pay' (ME-2). The 'capacity to pay' was derived by subtracting state-wise poverty-line household expenditure from household consumption expenditure. The average maternal expenditure varied by place of delivery: US dollar 9.5, US dollar 24.7 and US dollar 104.3 for birth at home, in a public facility and in a private facility, respectively. Sixteen per cent of households incurred ME of more than 10% of total household consumption expenditure (ME-1), while 51% households incurred ME of more than 40% of household 'capacity to pay' (ME-2). While incidence of ME-1 increased with income decile, the reverse was observed for ME-2, reflecting higher non-utilization of institutional maternal care and its non-affordability among poorer households. All the households from the poorest decile and 99% from the second poorest decile paid more than 40% of their capacity to pay. Multivariate regression results indicate that antenatal care and delivery care in private facilities increased the chances of ME-1 and ME-2 (P < 0.001). Measuring maternal expenditure against 'capacity to pay' (ME-2) may be better than measuring it as a proportion of overall household expenditure when assessing financial constraints in the use of maternal services. Improving the performance of the public sector, appropriate regulation of and partnership with the private sector, and effective direct cash transfers to pregnant women in the poorest households may increase utilization of maternal services and reduce the financial distress associated with ME.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Tremendous Cost of Seeking Hospital Obstetric Care in Bangladesh
Afsana, K. (2004) · Reproductive Health Matters · doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(04)24142-8 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Trends in catastrophic health expenditure in India: 1993 to 2014
Pandey, A., Ploubidis, G. B., Clarke, L., & Dandona, L. (2018) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.17.191759 · Cited by 238
Determinants of catastrophic health expenditure in Nigeria
Aregbeshola, B. S., & Khan, S. M. (2018) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-017-0899-1 · Cited by 95
Guliani, H., Sepehri, A., & Serieux, J. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.008 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonu, S., Bhushan, I., Rani, M., & Anderson, I.
- Venue
- Health Policy and Planning
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-08-17
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 445-456
- ISSN
- 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2237
- OpenAlex
- W2115152795
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and correlates of 'catastrophic' maternal health care expenditure in India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/heapol/czp032
- The paper
- Bonu, S., Bhushan, I., Rani, M., & Anderson, I. (2009). Incidence and correlates of 'catastrophic' maternal health care expenditure in India. Health Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czp032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.