Cited by 137HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsGlobal Health Workforce IssuesHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses

The effectiveness and cost implications of task-shifting in the delivery of antiretroviral therapy to HIV-infected patients: a systematic review

Open access
Mdege, Noreen Dadirai, Chindove, Stanley, Ali, Shehzad·2013·Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Human resource shortages are a challenge to the rollout of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-infected patients, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Task-shifting has been recommended as an approach to reduce the impact of human resource shortages. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies to assess the effectiveness of task-shifting, and its impact on costs of ART provision. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PSYCINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge and the Current Controlled Trials Register for articles published up to January 2011. We included studies evaluating any task-shifting model against any other intervention using any of the following outcomes: mortality (all causes); occurrence of new AIDS-defining illness; virological outcomes; CD4 cell count; adherence to ART medicines (e.g. self-report and pill counts); hospital admissions; clinic visits; toxicity or adverse events; quality of life indicators; costs and cost-effectiveness. We did not pool the results because of high levels of clinical heterogeneity. RESULTS: We identified six effectiveness studies including a total of 19 767 patients. Non-inferior patient outcomes were achieved with task-shifting from doctors to nurses, or from health care professionals to mid-level workers or lay health workers. However, most of the identified studies were underpowered to detect any difference. Three studies were identified on the cost implications of task-shifting. Task-shifting resulted in substantial cost and physician time savings. CONCLUSIONS: The reviewed evidence suggests that task-shifting from doctors to nurses, or from health care professionals to lay health workers can potentially reduce costs of ART provision without compromising health outcomes for patients. Task-shifting is therefore a potentially effective and cost-effective approach to addressing the human resource limitations to ART rollout. However, most of the studies conducted were relatively small and more evidence is needed for each task-shifting model as it is currently limited.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapol/czs058

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 137

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Chung J, O'Brien M, Price J, Shumbusho F. 2008. Quantification of physician-time saved in a task shifting pilot program in Rwanda. AIDS 2008 -XVII International AIDS Conference. Abstract no. WEAB0205.
  2. Fairall LR, Bachmann MO, Lombard C et al. 2011. The effect of task-shifting antiretroviral care in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster randomised trial (STRETCH -streamlining tasks and roles to expand treatment and care for HIV). 6th International AIDS Society (IAS) Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention, 17-20 July, Rome, Italy. Abstract MOPDD0105 -Poster Discussion. Online at: http://pag.ias2011.org/Abstracts.aspx?SID¼ 51&AID¼2320, accessed 6 November 2011.
  3. Gimbel-Sherr K, Augusto O, Micek M et al. 2008. Task shifting to mid-level clinical health providers: an evaluation of quality of ART provided by tecnicos de medicina and physicians in Mozambique: AIDS 2008 -XVII International AIDS Conference. Abstract no. WEAX0105.
  4. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). 2008. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Authors
Mdege, N. D., Chindove, S., & Ali, S.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Mdege, Noreen Dadirai
Venue
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2012-06-26
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
223-236
ISSN
  • 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2237
OpenAlex
W2165664560
Cited by
137
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Policy and Planning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Keywords
task shifting, antiretroviral therapy, HIV, human resource shortage, nurses, lay health workers, cost-effectiveness, healthcare workers, antiretroviral therapy adherence, virological outcomes, sub-Saharan Africa
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Physician's Role, HIV Infections, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, CD4 Lymphocyte Count, Anti-HIV Agents, Nurse's Role, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review