Does the distribution of healthcare utilization match needs in Africa?
Abstract
An equitable distribution of healthcare use, distributed according to people's needs instead of ability to pay, is an important goal featuring on many health policy agendas worldwide. However, relatively little is known about the extent to which this principle is violated across socio-economic groups in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We examine cross-country comparative micro-data from 18 SSA countries and find that considerable inequalities in healthcare use exist and vary across countries. For almost all countries studied, healthcare utilization is considerably higher among the rich. When decomposing these inequalities we find that wealth is the single most important driver. In 12 of the 18 countries wealth is responsible for more than half of total inequality in the use of care, and in 8 countries wealth even explains more of the inequality than need, education, employment, marital status and urbanicity together. For the richer countries, notably Mauritius, Namibia, South Africa and Swaziland, the contribution of wealth is typically less important. As the bulk of inequality is not related to need for care and poor people use less care because they do not have the ability to pay, healthcare utilization in these countries is to a large extent unfairly distributed. The weak average relationship between need for and use of health care and the potential reporting heterogeneity in self-reported health across socio-economic groups imply that our findings are likely to even underestimate actual inequities in health care. At a macro level, we find that a better match of needs and use is realized in those countries with better governance and more physicians. Given the absence of social health insurance in most of these countries, policies that aim to reduce inequities in access to and use of health care must include an enhanced capacity of the poor to generate income.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The observed drop-off when analyzing the cascade of respondents who express symptoms, to those who seek facility-based care, to those who are treated by a trained healthcare provider, is also observed in similar research contexts.
“Additionally, the observed drop-off when analyzing the cascade of respondents who express symptoms, to those who seek facility-based care, to those who are treated by a trained healthcare provider, is also observed in similar research contexts [30–32].”
From Community and facility-level barriers to achieving UHC in Kono District, Sierra Leone and Maryland County, Liberia (2023) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys
Moussavi, S., Chatterji, S., Verdes, E., Tandon, A., Patel, V., & Ustun, B. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61415-9 · Cited by 4,070 · see citing works
Tackling Africa’s chronic disease burden: from the local to the global
de-Graft Aikins, A., Unwin, N., Agyemang, C., Allotey, P., Campbell, C., & Arhinful, D. (2010) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/1744-8603-6-5 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gordon, T., Booysen, F., & Mbonigaba, J. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-8368-7 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Higgins, J., JEROME, J. G., Boima, F., Dally, E., Krangar, L., Boley, E. J., Toussaint, S., Dibba, Y., Kachimanga, C., Mhango, M., et al. (2023) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002045 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bonfrer, I., van de Poel, E., Grimm, M., & Van Doorslaer, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Passau (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bonfrer, Igna
- Venue
- Health Policy and Planning
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-10-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 921-937
- ISSN
- 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2237
- OpenAlex
- W2135838706
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Policy and Planning (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- health care utilization, health equity, need-based allocation, wealth inequality, sub-Saharan Africa, self-reported health, health governance, physician supply, social health insurance, health care access, income generation
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Poverty, Models, Statistical, Africa South of the Sahara, Resource Allocation, Healthcare Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review