The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health literacy: communication for the public good
Open accessAbstract
This article builds upon a presentation at the Fifth Global Health Conference on Health Promotion (Mexico City, 9 June 2000), seeking to advance the development of health literacy through effective communication. First, it offers a timely reflection for health promotion epistemology in particular, and the potential approach to framing health promotion activities in general, with health literacy as a bridging concept. The concept of health literacy is briefly explained and defined, followed by identification of some promising communication interventions to diffuse health literacy. Four predominant areas within the communication field are described that shed light on approaches for developing health literacy: integrated marketing communication, education, negotiation and social capital. Each component can contribute to strategic science-based communication. Finally, the article elucidates that communication and developing health literacy are not simple solutions. Communication is not simply message repetition, but includes the development of an environment for community involvement to espouse common values of humankind. With effective communication, worldwide health literacy can become a reality in the 21st century, embodying health as a central tenet of human life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Orleans, C. T. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.suppl1.76 · Cited by 174
Cited by
Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature
DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x · Cited by 2,309
Berkman, N. D., Davis, T. C., & McCormack, L. (2010) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.499985 · Cited by 1,051
McMurray, A., Johnson, P., Wallis, M., Patterson, E., & Griffiths, S. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01725.x · Cited by 101
Diez-Canseco, F., Zavala-Loayza, J. A., Beratarrechea, A., Kanter, R., Ramirez-Zea, M., Rubinstein, A., Martinez, H., & Miranda, J. J. (2015) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.3874 · Cited by 68
Health literacy in schools: prioritising health and well-being issues through the curriculum
Kilgour, L., Matthews, N., Christian, P., & Shire, J. (2015) · Sport, Education and Society · doi:10.1080/13573322.2013.769948 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Ratzan, S. C.
- Venue
- Health Promotion International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-214
- ISSN
- 0957-4824 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2245
- OpenAlex
- W2145545432
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health literacy: communication for the public good. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/heapro/16.2.207
- The paper
- Ratzan, S. C. (2001). Health literacy: communication for the public good. Health Promotion International. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/16.2.207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.