The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries
Abstract
Studies of adults report inconsistent findings as to whether males or females are more likely to use violent behaviors toward their partner. Although partner violence frequently begins during adolescence, few dating violence studies involve adolescents and even fewer report findings by gender. This study examines gender differences in adolescent dating violence. Data are from self-administered questionnaires completed by 81% of the adolescents in the eighth and ninth grades in a primarily rural school district in North Carolina. The significant findings are that (1) females perpetrate more mild, moderate and severe violence than males towards partners even when controlling for violence perpetrated in self-defense; (2) females perpetrate more violence than males out of self-defense; (3) males perpetrate more sexual dating violence than females; (4) males and females sustain equal amounts of mild, moderate and severe dating violence; (5) females sustain more sexual dating violence than males; (6) females sustain more psychological abuse than males from their partners; and (7) females receive more injuries than males from dating violence. These findings suggest that adolescent dating violence prevention programs are warranted and that unlike most dating violence prevention programs, both males and females should be exposed to activities related to victimization and perpetration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Urbina, S. (2014) · doi:10.1002/9781394259458 · Cited by 1,845
The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships
Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., & Polek, D. S. (1990) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/bf00978514 · Cited by 625
Romance and violence in dating relationships
HENTON, J., CATE, R., KOVAL, J., LLOYD, S., & CHRISTOPHER, S. (1983) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/019251383004003004 · Cited by 355
Cited by
Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review
Archer, J. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651 · Cited by 2,507
Silverman, J. G. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.5.572 · Cited by 1,238
Longitudinal associations between teen dating violence victimization and adverse health outcomes
Exner-Cortens, D., Eckenrode, J., & Rothman, E. (2013) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1029 · Cited by 837
An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Arriaga, X. B., Helms, R. W., Koch, G. G., & Linder, G. F. (1998) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.88.1.45 · Cited by 633
Self-citationAdolescent Dating Violence: Do Adolescents Follow in Their Friends’, Or Their Parents’, Footsteps?
Arriaga, X. B., & Foshee, V. A. (2004) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260503260247 · Cited by 586
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Foshee, V. A.
- Venue
- Health Education Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-286
- ISSN
- 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3648
- OpenAlex
- W2171059764
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/her/11.3.275-a
- The paper
- Foshee, V. A. (1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries. Health Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/11.3.275-a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.