The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of forward stage transitions: a Delphi study
Open accessAbstract
Insight into stage transition determinants is necessary to develop and evaluate stage-tailored health-promoting interventions. A three-round Delphi study among stages of change researchers was conducted to make an inventory of opinions and examine agreement on determinants of forward transitions between Transtheoretical stages of change. In the first round, 10 experts completed an electronic questionnaire with open-ended questions about potential determinants for each stage transition. In the second round, a structured electronic questionnaire based on the first round results was sent to authors of scientific papers on stages of change, published between 1995 and May 2002. In the third round, participants were presented feedback about the second round and were asked to re-rate their answers based on the information provided. Results showed that participants agreed on various transition determinants, but that determinants were not always stage-specific, e.g. control-related issues and social support were identified as determinants of all transitions from contemplation to maintenance. The results further showed lower consensus about determinants of earlier stage transitions than about determinants of later stage transitions. The Delphi study identified hypotheses worthy of further examination in longitudinal observational and experimental studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.9.1102 · Cited by 8,596
The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change.
Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 · Cited by 7,782
Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478
The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography
Pill, J. (1971) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/0038-0121(71)90041-3 · Cited by 579
Exercise and the transtheoretical model: A longitudinal test of a population sample
Plotnikoff, R. C., Hotz, S. B., Birkett, N. J., & Courneya, K. S. (2001) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.2001.0914 · Cited by 182
Cited by
Consensus measurement in Delphi studies
von der Gracht, H. A. (2012) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013 · Cited by 1,831
Rietjens, J. A. C., Sudore, R. L., Connolly, M., van Delden, J. J., Drickamer, M. A., Droger, M., van der Heide, A., Heyland, D. K., Houttekier, D., Janssen, D. J. A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30582-x · Cited by 1,371
van der Steen, J. T., Radbruch, L., Hertogh, C. M., de Boer, M. E., Hughes, J. C., Larkin, P., Francke, A. L., Jünger, S., Gove, D., Firth, P., et al. (2014) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216313493685 · Cited by 997
Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion
Akins, R. B., Tolson, H., & Cole, B. R. (2005) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-37 · Cited by 994
Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study
Barnes, S. J., & Mattsson, J. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.006 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- De Vet, E.
- Venue
- Health Education Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-14
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-205
- ISSN
- 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3648
- OpenAlex
- W2125009468
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of forward stage transitions: a Delphi study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/her/cyg111
- The paper
- De Vet, E. (2004). Determinants of forward stage transitions: a Delphi study. Health Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
