The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uniparental disomy in humans: development of an imprinting map and its implications for prenatal diagnosis
Abstract
Uniparental disomy (UPD) in humans is caused primarily by meiotic nondisjunction events, followed by trisomy or monosomy 'rescue'. The majority of cases appear to be associated with advanced maternal age, and may be initially detected as mosaic trisomies during routine prenatal diagnosis by chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. In addition, structural abnormalities including Robertsonian translocations, reciprocal translocations and supernumerary marker chromosomes appear to be associated with an increased risk of UPD. Predicting the phenotypic effects of UPD is complex, as three independent factors are involved: (i) effects of trisomy on the placenta or the fetus; (ii) autosomal recessive disease due to reduction to homozygosity; and (iii) imprinted gene effects for some chromosomes. To date, UPD in humans has been reported for 25 of the 47 possible uniparental types. Imprinting effects have been established with certainty for four human chromosomes that have homology to mouse chromosomes which have been shown to have significant phenotypic effects in uniparental animals. A normal phenotype has been reported for 14 other UPD types. Thus, collection of data on UPD cases in humans is providing an imprinting map analogous to the experimentally derived imprinting map in mouse. This human imprinting map has important clinical implications, particularly in the area of prenatal diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evidence from Turner's syndrome of an imprinted X-linked locus affecting cognitive function
Skuse, D. H., James, R. S., Bishop, D. V. M., Coppin, B., Dalton, P., Aamodt-Leeper, G., Bacarese-Hamilton, M., Creswell, C., McGurk, R., & Jacobs, P. A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42706 · Cited by 747
Angelman syndrome: a review of the clinical and genetic aspects
Clayton-Smith, J., & Laan, L. (2003) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.40.2.87 · Cited by 687
Genomic Imprinting: Implications for Human Disease
Falls, J. G., Pulford, D. J., Wylie, A. A., & Jirtle, R. L. (1999) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65309-6 · Cited by 359
Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in humans
Liehr, T., Claussen, U., & Starke, H. (2004) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000079572 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Ledbetter, D., & Engel, E.
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-09-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- 1757-1764
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W1824780271
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uniparental disomy in humans: development of an imprinting map and its implications for prenatal diagnosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/hmg/4.suppl_1.1757
- The paper
- Ledbetter, D., & Engel, E. (1995). Uniparental disomy in humans: development of an imprinting map and its implications for prenatal diagnosis. Human Molecular Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/4.suppl_1.1757
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.