The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A single nucleotide difference that alters splicing patterns distinguishes the SMA gene SMN1 from the copy gene SMN2
Abstract
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a recessive disorder characterized by loss of motor neurons in the spinal cord. It is caused by mutations in the telomeric survival motor neuron 1 ( SMN1 ) gene. Alterations within an almost identical copy gene, the centromeric survival motor neuron 2 ( SMN2 ) gene produce no known phenotypic effect. The exons of the two genes differ by just two nucleotides, neither of which alters the encoded amino acids. At the genomic level, only five nucleotides that differentiate the two genes from one another have been reported. The entire genomic sequence of the two genes has not been determined. Thus, differences which might explain why SMN1 is the SMA gene are not readily apparent. In this study, we have completely sequenced and compared genomic clones containing the SMN genes. The two genes show striking similarity, with the homology being unprecedented between two different yet functional genes. The only critical difference in an approximately 32 kb region between the two SMN genes is the C->T base change 6 bp inside exon 7. This alteration but not other variations in the SMN genes affects the splicing pattern of the genes. The majority of the transcript from the SMN1 locus is full length, whereas the majority of the transcript produced by the SMN2 locus lacks exon 7. We suggest that the exon 7 nucleotide change affects the activity of an exon splice enhancer. In SMA patients, the loss of SMN1 but the presence of SMN2 results in low levels of full-length SMN transcript and therefore low SMN protein levels which causes SMA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tusié-Luna, M. T., & White, P. C. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.23.10796 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: exonic mutations that affect splicing
Cartegni, L., Chew, S. L., & Krainer, A. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg775 · Cited by 2,209
Current clinical applications of in vivo gene therapy with AAVs
Mendell, J. R., Al-Zaidy, S. A., Rodino-Klapac, L. R., Goodspeed, K., Gray, S. J., Kay, C. N., Boye, S. L., Boye, S. E., George, L. A., Salabarria, S., et al. (2021) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.12.007 · Cited by 743
Spinal muscular atrophy: why do low levels of survival motor neuron protein make motor neurons sick?
Burghes, A. H. M., & Beattie, C. E. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2670 · Cited by 723
SMN2 splice modulators enhance U1–pre-mRNA association and rescue SMA mice
Palacino, J., Swalley, S. E., Song, C., Cheung, A. K., Shu, L., Zhang, X., Van Hoosear, M., Shin, Y., Chin, D. N., Keller, C. G., et al. (2015) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1837 · Cited by 432
An exonic enhancer is required for inclusion of an essential exon in the SMA-determining gene SMN
Lorson, C. L. (2000) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/9.2.259 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Monani, U. R.
- Venue
- Human Molecular Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-07-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1177-1183
- ISSN
- 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2083
- OpenAlex
- W2165235225
- Cited by
- 954
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A single nucleotide difference that alters splicing patterns distinguishes the SMA gene SMN1 from the copy gene SMN2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/hmg/8.7.1177
- The paper
- Monani, U. R. (1999). A single nucleotide difference that alters splicing patterns distinguishes the SMA gene SMN1 from the copy gene SMN2. Human Molecular Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/8.7.1177
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.