Cited by 20Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Genetic architecture of plasma Alzheimer disease biomarkers

Open access
Bradley, Joseph, Gorijala, Priyanka, Schindler, Suzanne E, Sung, Yun J, Ances, Beau, the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, the Human Connectome Project, Ertekin-Taner, Nilüfer, Younkin, Steven +15 more·2023·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) biomarker levels have identified novel genes implicated in disease risk, onset and progression. However, lumbar punctures have limited availability and may be perceived as invasive. Blood collection is readily available and well accepted, but it is not clear whether plasma biomarkers will be informative for genetic studies. Here we perform genetic analyses on concentrations of plasma amyloid-β peptides Aβ40 (n = 1,467) and Aβ42 (n = 1,484), Aβ42/40 (n = 1467) total tau (n = 504), tau phosphorylated (p-tau181; n = 1079) and neurofilament light (NfL; n = 2,058). GWAS and gene-based analysis was used to identify single variant and genes associated with plasma levels. Finally, polygenic risk score and summary statistics were used to investigate overlapping genetic architecture between plasma biomarkers, CSF biomarkers and AD risk. We found a total of six genome-wide significant signals. APOE was associated with plasma Aβ42, Aβ42/40, tau, p-tau181 and NfL. We proposed 10 candidate functional genes on the basis of 12 single nucleotide polymorphism-biomarker pairs and brain differential gene expression analysis. We found a significant genetic overlap between CSF and plasma biomarkers. We also demonstrate that it is possible to improve the specificity and sensitivity of these biomarkers, when genetic variants regulating protein levels are included in the model. This current study using plasma biomarker levels as quantitative traits can be critical to identification of novel genes that impact AD and more accurate interpretation of plasma biomarker levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddad087

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shared genetic regulators across multiple tissues indicate some genetic overlap across tissues, although that overlap seems to be driven by either pleiotropic regions (APOE) or cis-signals.

    “indicating that shared genetic regulators across multiple tissues, 8 and suggesting some genetic overlap across tissues, although that overlap seems to be driven by either pleiotropic regions (APOE) or cis‐signals.”

    From A genetic and proteomic comparison of key AD biomarkers across tissues (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The ‘Overlap genetic architecture of plasma biomarkers with other AD phenotypes’ section reports genetic overlap between plasma and CSF biomarkers, strongest at APOE. The Discussion says overlap outside APOE is relatively low. These passages support the APOE part, but do not identify cis-signals as a driver of the overlap or establish the claim across multiple tissues beyond plasma and CSF; page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A previous study found genetic overlap between plasma and CSF in pQTLs of key AD genes.

    “At the genetic level, a previous study from Bradley and coauthors 8 found genetic overlap between plasma and CSF in protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) of key AD genes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Olsson, B., Lautner, R., Andreasson, U., Öhrfelt, A., Portelius, E., Bjerke, M., Hölttä, M., Rosén, C., Olsson, C., Strobel, G. et al. (2016) CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol., 15, 673-684.
  2. Corder, E.H., Saunders, A.M., Strittmatter, W.J., Schmechel, D.E., Gaskell, P.C., Small, G.W., Roses, A.D., Haines, J.L. and Pericak- Vance, M.A. (1979) (1993) gene dose of Apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families. Sci., 261, 921-923.
  3. Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J.C. and Müller, M. (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. Bioinformatics, 12(1), 77.
  4. Venables, W.N. and Ripley, B.D. (2002, 2002) In Chambers, J., Eddy, W., Härdle, W., Sheather, S. and Tierney, L. (eds), Modern Applied Statistics with S. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer New York, New York, NY.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bradley, J., Gorijala, P., Schindler, S. E., Sung, Y. J., Ances, B., the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, T. H. C. P., Ertekin-Taner, N., Younkin, S., Golde, T., Price, N., Bennett, D., Gaiteri, C., De Jager, P., Zhang, B., Schadt, E., Ehrlich, M., Haroutunian, V., Gandy, S., Iijima, K., Noggle, S., Mangravite, L., Fernandez, M. V., & Cruchaga, C.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis, MO 63110 , USA
Corresponding author
Cruchaga, Carlos
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2023-05-19
Volume
32
Issue
15
Pages
2532-2543
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W4377086941
Cited by
20
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01AG044546, RO1AG070941, P01AG003991, RF1AG053303, RF1AG058501, U01AG058922, R44 AG059489, P30AG066444, P01AG03991, P01AG026276)
  • Bright Focus (CA2016636)
  • Gerald and Henrietta Rauenhorst Foundation
  • Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (GC-201711-2013978)
  • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
  • Alzheimer's Association Zenith Fellows Award (ZEN-22-848604)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, plasma biomarkers, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, amyloid-beta, tau protein, phosphorylated tau, neurofilament light chain, apolipoprotein E, genetic architecture, polygenic risk score, genetic overlap, single nucleotide polymorphisms
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Peptide Fragments, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review