Resident-to-Resident Aggression in Nursing Homes: Social Worker Involvement and Collaboration with Nursing Colleagues
Abstract
Resident-to-resident aggression (RRA) is the most common form of abuse occurring in nursing homes. A staff referral to the facility social worker is a common intervention approach used to manage this behavior, yet studies are nonexistent regarding how nursing home social workers respond to such referrals or how their efforts link with interprofessional team members. The purpose of this study was to identify assessment and intervention strategies social workers use to address RRA and how they collaborate with nursing colleagues in the RRA management process. Semistructured interviews were completed with social services and nursing personnel (n = 90) from 10 nursing homes. Interview questions focused on the participants' role in addressing RRA and associated interprofessional partnerships. Thematic analysis of three a priori categories, social work assessment, intervention, and collaboration, identified that (1) assessment approaches include gathering information, applying knowledge of causal factors, and determining psychosocial impact; (2) intervention approaches comprise determining appropriate interventions, applying preventive approaches, and delivering psychosocial interventions; and (3) collaborative strategies include mutual assessment consultations, joint intervention planning, tandem intervention delivery, and maximizing professional strengths. Findings illustrate social workers' extensive involvement in responding to RRA incidents and the importance of social worker–…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For nurses and physiotherapists, relationships with colleagues are seen as a central job component requiring substantial commitment, dedication, and emotional engagement.
“For nurses and physiotherapists, their relationships with their colleagues are seen as a central job component (Bonifas, 2015), one that requires a substantial level of commitment, dedication, and emotional engagement (Gray, 2010;Henderson, 2001).”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Bonifas, 2015
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees
Gillet, N., Morin, A. J. S., Ndiaye, A., Colombat, P., & Fouquereau, E. (2020) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12322 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bonifas, R. P.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bonifas, Robin Patchell
- Venue
- Health & Social Work
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-06-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e101-e109
- ISSN
- 0360-7283 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-6854
- OpenAlex
- W2249702528
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health & Social Work (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Keywords
- nursing homes, social work assessment, social work intervention, interprofessional collaboration, direct care workers, psychosocial interventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review