Cited by 9Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Activities of daily living assessment among nursing home residents with advanced dementia: Psychometric reevaluation of the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct psychometric reevaluation of the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADL) among a population logistically difficult to observe beyond cross-sectional analysis: nursing home residents with advanced dementia (AD). Data from observation-based measures were collected by nursing home staff at two intervals within a three-month time frame among 43 residents identified with AD via medical records and nursing home staff. Three broad properties of BADL were examined: factor structure, reliability, and validity. Principal components analysis determined underlying components. BADL internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's and Guttman coefficients; test-retest reliability was also observed. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating BADL with theoretically linked measures of quality of life (QOL) and social engagement. Compared with the original evaluation, BADL showed inconsistent factor structure at interval 1 but comparable at interval 2. Reliability coefficients at both intervals were robust and comparable to the original evaluation. BADL demonstrated significant convergence with QOL and social engagement. Psychometric potency of BADL was confirmed, suggesting practice applicability with this AD population. Future research calls for further examination of tools to guide effective interventions with this vulnerable population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hsw/hly010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Boyd, P. A., Wilks, S. E., & Geiger, J. R.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wilks, Scott E
Venue
Health & Social Work
Published
2018-03-15
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
101-108
ISSN
  • 0360-7283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-6854
OpenAlex
W2791348498
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health & Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
activities of daily living, advanced dementia, nursing home residents, psychometric properties, factor structure, reliability statistics, convergent validity, quality of life, social engagement, observational assessment, long-term care
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review