The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A prospective study of early pregnancy loss
Abstract
The New York State Early Pregnancy Detection Study was a prospective study of early pregnancy loss, between implantation and menses, in 217 women attempting to become pregnant during 1989-1992. Women collected urine samples on three consecutive mornings during the late luteal phase of their menstrual cycle, for up to 12 cycles, contributing samples for 1253 menstrual cycles. Urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), measured using an immunoradiometric assay, was the biomarker for pregnancy. We observed a range of early pregnancy loss (EPL) rates, from a low estimate of 11.0% to a high estimate of 26.9%, depending on the definition used and the subgroup analysed. Based on a definition of 3 days of HCG concentration > or = 4.00 pmol/l, 2 days > or = 5.33 pmol/l or the last day of HCG > or = 6.67 pmol/l, we identified 115 positive cycles; 95 cycles were clinically confirmed pregnancies and 20 cycles were EPL, giving an EPL rate of 17.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.0-25.6]. In addition, we observed an EPL rate of 19.5% (95% CI 11.3-30.1) for samples collected within a 15 day window around menses, and a rate of 20.3% (95% CI 11.3-32.2) for samples limited to the first three menstrual cycles. Because studies use urine collection schemes other than daily sampling, the definition of pregnancy will be crucial in defining EPL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early embryonic mortality in women
Edmonds, D. K., Lindsay, K. S., Miller, J. F., Williamson, E., & Wood, P. J. (1982) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46579-9 · Cited by 512
Cited by
Stagnaro-Green, A., Abalovich, M., Alexander, E., Azizi, F., Mestman, J., Negro, R., Nixon, A., Pearce, E. N., Soldin, O. P., Sullivan, S., et al. (2011) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2011.0087 · Cited by 2,942
Alexander, E. K., Pearce, E. N., Brent, G. A., Brown, R. S., Chen, H., Dosiou, C., Grobman, W. A., Laurberg, P., Lazarus, J. H., Mandel, S. J., et al. (2017) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2016.0457 · Cited by 2,731
Risk factors for first trimester miscarriage—results from a UK-population-based case-control study
Maconochie, N., Doyle, P., Prior, S., & Simmons, R. (2007) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01193.x · Cited by 387
A systematic review to calculate background miscarriage rates using life table analysis
Ammon Avalos, L., Galindo, C., & Li, D. (2012) · Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology · doi:10.1002/bdra.23014 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellish, N. J., Saboda, K., O'Connor, J., Nasca, P. C., Stanek, E. J., & Boyle, C.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-02-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 406-412
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2171019617
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective study of early pregnancy loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/11.2.406
- The paper
- Ellish, N. J., Saboda, K., O'Connor, J., Nasca, P. C., Stanek, E. J., & Boyle, C. (1996). A prospective study of early pregnancy loss. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/11.2.406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.