The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response
Abstract
The study tests the hypothesis that small ovaries measured on transvaginal sonography (TVS) are associated with a poor response to ovulation induction by human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). A total of 140 infertile patients with morphologically normal ovaries undergoing IVF was studied. The mean ovarian volume of each patient was measured on TVS before starting HMG. Subsequent routine IVF management was conducted without knowledge of the results of TVS. The mean ovarian volume was 6.3 cm3 (range 0.5-18.9, SD= 3.1). Patients (n = 17; group A) with small ovaries of < 3 cm3 (i.e. overall mean volume - 1 SD) were compared to patients (n = 123; group B) with ovaries > or = 3 cm3. Both groups were of similar age (mean 35.8 versus 34.4 years). Early basal FSH concentrations were increased in group A (9.5 versus 7.0 mIU/ml, P = 0.025). The cycle was abandoned before planned oocyte recovery in nine patients (52.8%) from group A and in 11 patients (8.9%) from group B because of poor response to ovulation induction (P < 0.001). Increased age and ovarian volume were associated independently with cancellation of the cycles. The remaining eight patients from group A who had oocytes retrieved required higher doses of HMG (87.5 versus 53.8 ampoules, P < 0.01), yielded fewer follicles (10.3 versus 14.5, P < 0.05) and fewer oocytes were recovered from them (6.8 versus 11.0, P < 0.05) compared with group B. There was no difference in the fertilization or pregnancy rates or the number of embryos available for transfer in either group. Our results indicate a strong association between ovarian volume and ovarian reserve. Small ovaries are associated with poor response to HMG and a very high cancellation rate during IVF. Assessment of ovarian size should be an integral part of infertility evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome
Broekmans, F. J., Kwee, J., Hendriks, D. J., Mol, B. W., & Lambalk, C. B. (2006) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml034 · Cited by 1,258
Bancsi, L. F. J. M. M., Broekmans, F. J. M., Eijkemans, M. J. C., de Jong, F. H., Habbema, J. D. F., & te Velde, E. R. (2002) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02983-1 · Cited by 441
Anderson, R. A., McLaughlin, M., Wallace, W. H. B., Albertini, D. F., & Telfer, E. E. (2014) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/det388 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Lass, A., Skull, J., McVeigh, E., Margara, R., & Winston, R. M.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-02-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 294-297
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2122417464
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/12.2.294
- The paper
- Lass, A., Skull, J., McVeigh, E., Margara, R., & Winston, R. M. (1997). Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.2.294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.