The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: the Walcheren primary care study
Open accessAbstract
The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis of couples in a primary care situation has never been studied. Prognostic models have been developed for referral populations only. We wished to develop a prognostic model to estimate the likelihood of live birth and the impact of prognostic factors among untreated subfertile couples in a primary care situation. With this aim, we conducted a cohort follow-up study of 726 couples in the peninsula of Walcheren, a geographically isolated, but demographically and socio-economically representative area of an industrialized Western society, The Netherlands. Of the Walcheren population, 9.9% exhibit subfertility complaints at least once during their lifetime. There were 201 live birth conceptions during 9915 months of untreated observation. The cumulative rate of conceptions leading to live births was 52.5% when all of the untreated observations were considered, and 72.0% in the subgroup of 342 couples who remained untreated throughout their follow-up. The relevant prognostic factors in this primary care subfertility population were: abnormal post-coital test, tubal defect, ovulation defect, and duration of subfertility. A prediction score based on these factors would be accurate in approximately 76-79% of cases. Live birth prognosis can be estimated with sufficient accuracy to be useful in counselling subfertility patients, and in planning clinical management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome
Broekmans, F. J., Kwee, J., Hendriks, D. J., Mol, B. W., & Lambalk, C. B. (2006) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml034 · Cited by 1,258
Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility
Gnoth, C., Godehardt, E., Frank-Herrmann, P., Friol, K., Tigges, J., & Freundl, G. (2005) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh870 · Cited by 603
The importance of folate, zinc and antioxidants in the pathogenesis and prevention of subfertility
Ebisch, I. M. W., Thomas, C. M. G., Peters, W. H. M., Braat, D. D. M., & Steegers-Theunissen, R. P. M. (2007) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml054 · Cited by 503
Gnoth, C. (2003) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deg366 · Cited by 458
Pesticide exposure: the hormonal function of the female reproductive system disrupted?
Bretveld, R. W., Thomas, C. M., Scheepers, P. T., Zielhuis, G. A., & Roeleveld, N. (2006) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-4-30 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Snick, H. K., Snick, T. S., Evers, J. L., & Collins, J. A.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1582-1588
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2108883609
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: the Walcheren primary care study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/12.7.1582
- The paper
- Snick, H. K., Snick, T. S., Evers, J. L., & Collins, J. A. (1997). The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: the Walcheren primary care study. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.7.1582
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.